MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210277909 · doi:10.1161/str.53.suppl_1.wmp108

Abstract WMP108: Prevalence Of High-Risk Aortic Arch Atherosclerosis Features Among Patients With Embolic Stroke Of Undetermined Source

2022· article· en· W4210277909 on OpenAlexaff
Matthew Boyko, Surbhi Chaturvedi, Benjamin Béland, Mohamed Najm, Andrew M. Demchuk, Bijoy K. Menon, Mohammed Almekhlafi

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAortic Thrombus and Embolism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryCalgary Laboratory Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAortic archEtiologyCardiologyStroke (engine)Internal medicineAortaEmbolic strokeAscending aortaDescending aortaRadiologyIschemic strokeIschemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) comprises a heterogenous group. There is a need to further identify etiologies within this group to guide management strategies. We examined the prevalence of aortic arch atherosclerosis (AAA) in ESUS patients on CT angiography (CTA) to characterize high-risk plaque features. Methods: All patients from two prospective multicenter studies (INTERRSeCT and PRove-IT) were included if the CTA adequately imaged the proximal aortic arch and the etiology was recorded. Three independent readers analyzed the following AAA plaque features on CTA at the time of acute ischemic stroke: 1) thickness in mm (radial measurement at thickest point); 2) morphology (Figure a-c): none, smooth, ulcerated, or protruding; 3) location within the aortic arch (proximal, transverse, or distal); and 4) calcification (Figure a, d-f): none, single small, multiple small, single large, or diffuse extensive. Reader disagreement was resolved by consensus. Results: We included 1063 patients, of which 293 (27.6%) had ESUS (mean age 67.5 years; 46.4% men). The mean AAA thickness was significantly larger in ESUS versus non-ESUS patients (3.8 vs 3.0 mm, p<0.0001). The ESUS group had a significantly higher proportion of ulcerated or protruding plaques (17.4% vs 10.3%; risk ratio 1.7, CI 95 1.2-2.4, p=0.002). The location of AAA in the ESUS group was the ascending aorta in 37.9%, transverse arch in 42.3%, and descending aorta in 84.6%. Although AAA was mostly located in the distal aortic arch, ulcerated or protruding plaques were least common in the distal arch (p=0.002). There was no difference between ESUS and non-ESUS patients in plaque location (p=0.23) or calcification grade (p=0.092). Conclusions: ESUS patients had thicker AAA plaques and a higher prevalence of ulcerated or protruding plaques located more proximally within the aortic arch. High-risk plaque features could be a potential cause of acute ischemic stroke in the ESUS population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.726

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStrokeSame topicAortic Thrombus and EmbolismFrench-language works237,207