MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210291707 · doi:10.1002/alz.051668

Tau spreads across connected brain regions in progressive supranuclear palsy and corticobasal syndrome

2021· article· en· W4210291707 on OpenAlexaff
Nicolai Franzmeier, Matthias Brendel, Leonie Beyer, Thomas Arzberger, Gábor G. Kovács, Anna Rubinski, Carla Palleis, Sabrina Katzdobler, Anika Finze, Mengmeng Song, Gloria Biechele, Maike Kern, Maximilian Scheifele, Boris‐Stephan Rauchmann, Robert Perneczky, Michael Rullmann, Andreas Schildan, Henryk Barthel, Osama Sabri, Joseph Claßen, Milica Ječmenica‐Lukić, David J. Irwin, Eddie B Lee, David G. Coughlin, Armin Giese, Murray Grossman, Carolin Kurz, Corey T. McMillan, Ellen Gelpí, Yaroslau Compta, John C. van Swieten, Claire Troakes, Safa Al‐Sarraj, Sigrun Roeber, Sharon X. Xie, Virginia M.‐Y. Lee, Jochen Herms, Peter Bartenstein, Christian Haass, Martin Dichgans, John Q. Trojanowski, Johannes Levin, Günter U. Höglinger, Michael Ewers

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProgressive supranuclear palsyCorticobasal degenerationTau pathologyNeuroscienceResting state fMRITauopathyPsychologyConnectomeAlzheimer's diseasePathologyMedicineFunctional connectivityAtrophyNeurodegenerationDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Cortico‐basal degeneration (CBD) and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) are 4R‐tauopathies characterized by progressive tau pathology spread that typically starts in the subcortex. Pre‐clinical studies suggest that tau spreads across connected neurons in an activity‐dependent manner, indicating that the brains’ connectome may mediate tau spreading. Supporting this, we found in Alzheimer’s disease that PET‐assessed cortical tau spreads across functionally connected regions. Here, we assessed whether connectivity mediates cortical/subcortical tau spreading also in 4R‐tauopathies, by combining resting‐state fMRI connectivity with i) 2nd generation in vivo tau‐PET (PI2620) in CBS and PSP and ii) post‐mortem tau assessments in PSP. Method We assessed PI2620 tau‐PET in 24 CBS‐patients, 28 PSP‐patients and 15 healthy controls. Voxel‐wise tau‐PET differences were determined between patients vs. controls and mean tau‐PET SUVRs were assessed for 232 cortical/subcortical‐ROIs (Fig. 1A). Semi‐quantitative post‐mortem AT8‐stained neuronal tau was assessed in two additional, non‐overlapping PSP samples (Munich: n=96; & UPENN: n=97). Neuropathological ROIs were reconstructed in MRI‐standard‐space (Figs. 1B&C). Functional connectivity was assessed between tau‐PET‐ROIs and neuropathological‐ROIs using out‐of‐sample resting‐state fMRI from 69 elderly amyloid‐ and tau‐negative controls. Using linear regression, we assessed the association between ROI‐to‐ROI connectivity and covariance in tau‐PET or post‐mortem tau levels in spatially corresponding ROI pairs. For tau‐PET, we further tested at the subject level, whether functional connectivity of tau epicenters (i.e. ROIs with highest tau‐PET in a given subject) predicted tau deposition in connected regions, using linear mixed models controlling for age, gender and random intercept. Result PSP and CBS patients showed elevated tau‐PET compared to controls (Fig. 2). Higher functional connectivity was associated with higher covariance in tau‐PET in PSP and CBS (b=0.402‐0.715, Fig. 3A‐D, all p<0.001). For post‐mortem data, higher ROI‐to‐ROI functional connectivity was also associated higher covariance in tau in both PSP samples (b=0.468&0.765, p<0.001, Fig. 3E&F). Using tau‐PET we found further that connectivity patterns of subject‐level subcortical tau epicenters was associated with subject‐level tau‐PET uptake in connected regions (Fig. 4B‐E, all p<0.001). Conclusion Highly functionally connected brain regions share similar tau levels in 4R‐tauopathies as indicated by tau‐PET and post‐mortem assessments, suggesting that brain connectivity is associated with inter‐regional tau spreading in 4R‐tauopathies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesFrench-language works237,207