MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210309822 · doi:10.1049/pbtr020e_ch8

Design of systems with nonautomated electric vehicles

2021· book-chapter· en· W4210309822 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitution of Engineering and Technology eBooks · 2021
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTransportation and Mobility Innovations
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeclarationRelocationService (business)Electric vehicleSystems designTransport engineeringEngineeringComputer scienceOperations researchBusinessSystems engineeringOperating systemMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chapter Contents: 8.1 Introduction 8.2 Categories of services 8.3 Design framework for shared electric vehicle system 8.3.1 Design variables 8.3.2 Multistation system 8.3.3 User access 8.3.4 User expectations 8.3.5 Vehicle fleet and relocation 8.3.6 Parking stalls and other infrastructure 8.3.7 Fast charger stalls 8.3.8 System operation, control, and maintenance 8.4 Methods to support system design 8.4.1 Treatment of stochastic factors 8.4.2 Simulation and optimization techniques 8.5 Employee-dedicated shared vehicle system case study 8.5.1 General description 8.5.2 Location and size 8.5.3 Demand and fleet 8.5.4 Service factors 8.5.5 Serving higher demand levels 8.6 Design for ride-hailing EVs 8.6.1 Pick-up and drop-off facilities 8.6.2 Charging facilities 8.7 Conclusions Acknowledgments Author contribution Declaration of conflicting interests References

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.900
Threshold uncertainty score0.735

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it