Metabolic Phenotype of Daphnia Under Hypoxia: Macroevolution, Microevolution, and Phenotypic Plasticity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Daphnia is a freshwater crustacean that is able to upregulate hemoglobin (Hb) in response to hypoxia, imparting a red color. We combine multiple field surveys across season with a lab experiment to evaluate changes in the metabolic phenotype of Daphnia in relation to environmental hypoxia. Looking at the zooplankton community, we found that D. pulicaria was restricted to lakes with a hypoxic hypolimnion. Comparing D. pulicaria with different amounts of Hb, red animals showed higher mRNA levels for several Hb genes, whereas most glycolytic genes showed red/pale differences of less than 50%. We also observed seasonal changes in the metabolic phenotype that differed between red and pale animals. Hb was upregulated early in the season in hypoxic lakes, and a relationship between Hb and lactate dehydrogenase only emerged later in the season in a temporal pattern that was lake specific. To evaluate whether these differences were due to specific lake environments or microevolutionary differences, we tested the induction of genes under controlled hypoxia in isofemale lines from each of four lakes. We found a strong response to 18 h hypoxia exposure in both Hb and lactate dehydrogenase mRNA, although the magnitude of the acute response was greater than the steady state differences in mRNA levels between pale and red Daphnia. The baseline expression of Hb and lactate dehydrogenase also varied between isofemale lines with different lake origins. These results, in combination with comparison of glycogen measurements, suggests that Hb functions primarily to facilitate oxygen delivery, mitigating systemic hypoxia, rather than an oxygen store. The combination of lab and field studies suggest that the metabolic phenotype of the animal is influenced by both microevolutionary differences (within and between lakes) as well as the spatial and temporal environmental heterogeneity of the lakes. The differences between Daphnia species, and the unexpected lack of hypoxia sensitivity of select glycolytic genes provide evidence of macroevolutionary differences in metabolic strategies to cope with hypoxia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".