Mealtime Support
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Tube feeding is essential for children who cannot meet nutritional requirements orally. Over time, this can lead to tube dependency with negative impacts on the quality of life of children and families. Objective: We aimed to examine the efficacy of a multidisciplinary child‐led, hunger‐based approach called “Mealtime Support” at the Stollery Children's Hospital in Edmonton. Nutritional outcomes, parental satisfaction, and cost implications were evaluated over 9 months postprogram completion per child. Methods: The ambulatory meal program was delivered 2–3 times a day, for 2 weeks, by an occupational therapist and dietitian, under medical supervision. Hunger was promoted by reducing tube fed calories by 80% before commencement. Caregivers completed 12‐question subjective surveys pre‐ and postintervention. Microcosting methods compared costs between the program and ongoing tube feeding. Results: From 2016 to 2017, 6 children were enrolled and 5 completed the program. At 1‐month postintervention, 4/5 of the children were 100% orally fed. Parents reported improvement in mealtime struggles ( P = 0.005), reduction in worry about their child's eating ( P = 0.005), and improvement in their child's appetite/variety foods eaten ( P = 0.004). Over 2 years, the potential cost savings were estimated at $43,471.00. By 6 months, all feeding tubes were removed. Conclusions: Mealtime support was safe and successful in reducing tube dependency and cost‐effective compared to no intervention or hospital based programs, which suggests that there is a need to develop and fund Canadian outpatient feeding programs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".