Bibliographic record
Abstract
Advances in computers, information and networks has brought a digital cyber world to our daily lives. They have generated numerous digital things (or cyber entities), which have resided in the cyber world. Meanwhile, countless real things in the conventional physical, social and mental worlds have possessed cyber mappings (or cyber components) to have a cyber existence in cyber world. Consequently, cyberization has been an emerging trend forming the new cyber world and reforming conventional worlds towards cyber-enabled hyper-worlds. As such, cybermatics helps build systematic knowledge about new phenomena, behaviors, properties and practices in the cyberspace, cyberization and cyber-enabled hyper-worlds. Cybermatics is characterized by catching up with the human intelligence (e.g. intelligent sensing, making decision and control, etc.), as well as learning from the nature-inspired attributes (e.g., dynamics, self-adaptability, energy saving). As a cybermatics technique, smart data analytics helps filter out the noise data and produce valuable data. In this paper, we focus on smart data analytics on health data related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It builds temporal and demographic hierarchies, which capture characteristics of COVID-19 patients, to discover valuable knowledge and information about temporal-demographic characteristics of these patients. Evaluation on real-life COVID-19 epidemiological data demonstrates the practicality of our solution in conducting smart data analytics on COVID-19 data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".