<scp>SLDCNet</scp>: Skin lesion detection and classification using full resolution convolutional network‐based deep learning <scp>CNN</scp> with transfer learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Skin cancer is one of the life threating diseases in the world. So, millions of lives can be saved by early detection of skin cancer. In addition, automating the computer‐aided system of skin lesion detection and classification (SLDC) will assist the medical practitioners to ensure more efficacious treatment of skin lesion disease. Material and Method In this article, a hybrid preprocessing‐based transfer learning model for SLDC is proposed, which is named as SLDCNet. Initially, the hybrid Gaussian filter (HGF) with connected component label (CCL) based fast march inpainting procedure is used for hair removal and denoising of skin lesions. Next, full resolution convolutional networks (FrCN) based segmentation method is adapted for detecting the cancer region. Then, feature extraction is performed using deep residual learning and finally, transfer learning mechanism is applied for classification of eight skin lesions. Results The extensive simulation results shows that proposed SLDCNet resulted in a classification accuracy of 99.92%, sensitivity of 99%, and specificity of 99.36%, respectively. Conclusion From the obtained results, it is proven that proposed SLDCNet provides better performance as compared to state‐of‐art SLDC approaches, and even the standard ISIC‐2019 public challenge.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".