MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4210352270 · doi:10.1002/alz.055763

Diagnostic value of plasma P‐tau217 in frontotemporal dementia spectrum disorders

2021· article· en· W4210352270 on OpenAlexaff
Julio C. Rojas, Lawren VandeVrede, Hilary W. Heuer, Gianina Toller, Elisabeth H. Thijssen, Nicholas K. Proctor, Leah K. Forsberg, Danielle Brushaber, Eliana Marisa Ramos, Giovanni Coppola, Brian S. Appleby, Yvette Bordelon, Hugo Botha, Brad C. Dickerson, Dennis W. Dickson, Kimiko Domoto‐Reilly, Anne M. Fagan, Julie A. Fields, Jamie Fong, Tatiana M. Foroud, Doug Galasko, Ralitza H. Gavrilova, Daniel H. Geschwind, Nupur Ghoshal, Jill Goldman, Neill R. Graff‐Radford, Jonathan Graff‐Radford, Ian Grant, Murray Grossman, Ging‐Yuek Robin Hsiung, Eric J. Huang, Edward D. Huey, David J. Irwin, David T. Jones, Kejal Kantarci, David S. Knopman, John Kornak, Walter K. Kremers, Maria I. Lapid, Gabriel C. Léger, Irene Litvan, Peter A. Ljubenkov, Diane Lucente, Ian R. Mackenzie, Joseph C. Masdeu, Corey T. McMillan, Mario F. Mendez, Bruce L. Miller, Toji Miyagawa, Chiadi U. Onyike, Belén Pascual, Otto Pedraza, Leonard Petrucelli, Rosa Rademakers, Katherine P. Rankin, Katya Rascovsky, Jessica E. Rexach, Aaron Ritter, Erik D. Roberson, Rodolfo Savica, William W. Seeley, Adam M. Staffaroni, Maria Carmela Trataglia, Arthur W. Toga, Sandra Weıntraub, Bonnie Wong, Zbigniew K. Wszołek, Jeffrey L. Dage, Bradley F. Boeve, Howard J. Rosen, Adam L. Boxer

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrontotemporal dementiaInternal medicineMedicinePrimary progressive aphasiaDementiaParkinsonismGastroenterologyNeuropsychologyDiseasePsychologyOncologyPathologyPsychiatryCognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Frontotemporal dementia spectrum disorders (FTD) display complex neuropathological substrates and poor clinicopathological correlations, which hinders therapy development. Plasma P‐tau217 is an emerging tool to screen for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology and may have diagnostic value in FTD. Method Plasma P‐tau217 was measured cross‐sectionally by electrochemiluminescence in FTD patients referred to ALLFTD from ARTFL (n = 628, 45.7% female, median age 66 ± 12 years). P‐tau217 differences by baseline phenotype, disease severity and genotype were determined with non‐parametric tests and general linear models. Associations between P‐tau217 and measures of disease severity and neuropsychological performance were determined with linear regressions corrected for age, sex, phenotype and APOE. Result The sample included 33% behavioral variant FTD, 23.6% primary progressive aphasia (PPA), 28.5% atypical parkinsonism, 1.6% amnestic dementia (AmDem), 2.8% FTD/motoneuron disease, 3% mild cognitive/behavioral impairment and 7.5% healthy controls. Only 1.6% carried FTD‐causing mutations. P‐tau217 was not related to age (r = 0.034, 95%CI ‐0.03 – 0.12, p = 0.4). Compared to controls (0.18 ± 0.07 pg/mL), P‐tau217 was elevated only in AmDem (0.58 ± 0.9 pg/mL, p = 0.001) and logopenic PPA (lvPPA, 0.71 ± 0.62 pg/mL p < 0.001). P‐tau217 ≥ 0.42 pg/mL effectively discriminated AmDem and lvPPA from all other phenotypes (AUC 0.87, 95%CI 0.77 – 0.96, p = 0.001, 77% sensitivity, 92% specificity). AmDem (60%) and lvPPA (91.7%) had the highest prevalence of high (≥ 0.42 pg/mL) P‐tau217, and the highest prevalence of APOE4 (AmDem 40%, lvPPA 63.6%). APOE4 carriers (0.23 ± 0.22 pg/mL) had higher P‐tau217, than non‐carriers (0.19 ± 0.09 pg/mL), regardless of phenotype (APOE effect p = .002, APOE x phenotype, p = 0.44). P‐tau217 was associated with worse clinical severity, mood, memory and executive function, but not with worse motor symptoms or social cognition. Conclusion When FTD is suspected, high plasma P‐tau217 is strongly associated with amnestic dementia and logopenic PPA phenotypes. Pending completion of ongoing neuropathological, CSF and molecular neuroimaging analyses, the data support the use of plasma P‐tau217 to identify atypical AD as a cause or AD as a co‐pathology contributing to FTD clinical presentation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments→French-language works237,207→