Probing the functional consequence and clinical relevance of <scp><i>CD320</i></scp> p.E88del, a variant in the transcobalamin receptor gene
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The biological and clinical significance of the p.E88del variant in the transcobalamin receptor, CD320 , is unknown. This allele is annotated in ClinVar as likely benign, pathogenic, and of uncertain significance. To determine functional consequence and clinical relevance of this allele, we employed cell culture and genetic association studies. Fibroblasts from 16 CD320 p.E88del homozygotes exhibited reduced binding and uptake of cobalamin. Complete ascertainment of newborns with transiently elevated C3 (propionylcarnitine) in New York State demonstrated that homozygosity for CD320 p.E88del was over‐represented (7/348, p < 6 × 10 −5 ). Using population data, we estimate that ~85% of the p.E88del homozygotes born in the same period did not have elevated C3, suggesting that cobalamin metabolism in the majority of these infants with this genotype is unaffected. Clinical follow‐up of 4/9 homozygous individuals uncovered neuropsychological findings, mostly in speech and language development. None of these nine individuals exhibited perturbation of cobalamin metabolism beyond the newborn stage even during periods of acute illness. Newborns homozygous for this allele in the absence of other factors are at low risk of requiring clinical intervention, although more studies are required to clarify the natural history of various CD320 variants across patient populations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".