The Effect of Three-Dimensional Whole, Major, and Small Vasculature on Mouse Brain Strain Under Both Diffuse and Focal Brain Injury Loading
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Blood vessels are much stiffer than brain parenchyma and their effects in finite element (FE) brain models need to be investigated. Despite the publication of some comprehensive three-dimensional (3D) brain vasculature models, no mechanical model exists for the mouse brain vasculature. Moreover, how the vasculature affects the mechanical behavior of brain tissue remains controversial. Therefore, we developed FE mouse brain models with detailed 3D vasculature to investigate the effect of the vasculature on brain strains under both diffuse (closed-head impact) and focal injury (controlled cortical impact (CCI)) loading, two commonly laboratory models of traumatic brain injury. The effect of the vasculature was examined by comparing maximum principal strain in mouse brain FE models with and without the vasculature. On average, modeling comprehensive vasculature under diffuse injury loading reduced average brain strain predictions by 32% with nonlinear elastic properties. Nearly three-fourths of the 32% strain reduction was attributable to the effects of the major branches of the vasculature. Meanwhile, during focal open-skull CCI injury loading, the contribution of the vasculature was limited, producing a less than 5% reduction in all cases. Overall, the vasculature, especially the major branches, increased the load-bearing capacity of the brain FE model and thus reduced brain strain predictions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".