MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210380316 · doi:10.1126/science.aaz5284

The Blood Proteoform Atlas: A reference map of proteoforms in human hematopoietic cells

2022· article· en· W4210380316 on OpenAlexaff
Rafael D. Melani, Vincent R. Gerbasi, Lissa C. Anderson, Jacek Sikora, Timothy K. Toby, Josiah E. Hutton, David Butcher, Fernanda Negrão, Henrique S. Seckler, Kristina Srzentić, Luca Fornelli, Jeannie M. Camarillo, Richard D. LeDuc, Anthony J. Cesnik, Emma Lundberg, Joseph B. Greer, Ryan T. Fellers, Matthew T. Robey, Caroline J. DeHart, Eleonora Forte, Christopher L. Hendrickson, Susan E. Abbatiello, Paul M. Thomas, Andy I. Kokaji, Josh Levitsky, Neil L. Kelleher

Bibliographic record

VenueScience · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic function and diabetes
Canadian institutionsStemcell Technologies
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesU.S. National Library of MedicineNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Cancer Institute
KeywordsHuman Protein AtlasHematopoietic cellComputational biologyBlood cellHaematopoiesisContext (archaeology)BiologyHuman bloodGeneCell biologyBioinformaticsGeneticsStem cellProtein expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human biology is tightly linked to proteins, yet most measurements do not precisely determine alternatively spliced sequences or posttranslational modifications. Here, we present the primary structures of ~30,000 unique proteoforms, nearly 10 times more than in previous studies, expressed from 1690 human genes across 21 cell types and plasma from human blood and bone marrow. The results, compiled in the Blood Proteoform Atlas (BPA), indicate that proteoforms better describe protein-level biology and are more specific indicators of differentiation than their corresponding proteins, which are more broadly expressed across cell types. We demonstrate the potential for clinical application, by interrogating the BPA in the context of liver transplantation and identifying cell and proteoform signatures that distinguish normal graft function from acute rejection and other causes of graft dysfunction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.349

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations145
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScienceSame topicPancreatic function and diabetesFrench-language works237,207