The effect of atropine used in dobutamine stress echocardiography on pupil diameter
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background The use of atropine during dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) is contraindicated in persons with narrow angle glaucoma though there is limited evidence that low doses of intravenous atropine do not cause pupillary dilation. Objective The aim of this study is to investigate whether atropine when administered in persons without glaucoma during dobutamine stress echocardiography causes pupillary dilation. Methods and Results Out of 144 patients without a history of glaucoma referred for DSE for clinical indications, 105 patients received intravenous atropine doses ranging from 0.1 mg to 1.25 mg (most patients received 0.25–0.75 mg). Pupil diameter of both eyes was measured under the same light conditions before and after the DSE using a CP-30 Optical Digital PD Ruler. For the total of 210 examined eyes pupil diameter remained unaltered after each DSE test (3.65 ± 0.799 mm before vs 3.63 ± 0.766 mm after, p = .737). Similarly, pupil diameter remained unchanged when left and right eyes were assessed separately (right eye: 3.770 ± 0.812 before vs 3.752 ± 0.745 mm after, p = .821 and left eye: 3.521 ± 0.770 before vs 3.499 ± 0.770 mm after, p = .806). Diameter of right and left pupil were also unaltered after grouping patients by sex and iris pigmentation. Age, weight, atropine dose and propranolol dose were not correlated with changes in pupil diameter. Conclusion Intravenous atropine in usual doses administered in DSE does not cause mydriasis in adults without glaucoma. Future studies need to confirm our findings and expand the investigation regarding safety of atropine use during DSE in patients with narrow angle glaucoma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".