The effect of atropine used in dobutamine stress echocardiography on pupil diameter
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background The use of atropine during dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) is contraindicated in persons with narrow angle glaucoma though there is limited evidence that low doses of intravenous atropine do not cause pupillary dilation. Objective The aim of this study is to investigate whether atropine when administered in persons without glaucoma during dobutamine stress echocardiography causes pupillary dilation. Methods and Results Out of 144 patients without a history of glaucoma referred for DSE for clinical indications, 105 patients received intravenous atropine doses ranging from 0.1 mg to 1.25 mg (most patients received 0.25–0.75 mg). Pupil diameter of both eyes was measured under the same light conditions before and after the DSE using a CP-30 Optical Digital PD Ruler. For the total of 210 examined eyes pupil diameter remained unaltered after each DSE test (3.65 ± 0.799 mm before vs 3.63 ± 0.766 mm after, p = .737). Similarly, pupil diameter remained unchanged when left and right eyes were assessed separately (right eye: 3.770 ± 0.812 before vs 3.752 ± 0.745 mm after, p = .821 and left eye: 3.521 ± 0.770 before vs 3.499 ± 0.770 mm after, p = .806). Diameter of right and left pupil were also unaltered after grouping patients by sex and iris pigmentation. Age, weight, atropine dose and propranolol dose were not correlated with changes in pupil diameter. Conclusion Intravenous atropine in usual doses administered in DSE does not cause mydriasis in adults without glaucoma. Future studies need to confirm our findings and expand the investigation regarding safety of atropine use during DSE in patients with narrow angle glaucoma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it