MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Towards Reliable Communications in Intelligent Reflecting Surface-Aided Cell-Free MIMO Systems

2021· article· en· W4210389341 on OpenAlexaff
Rui Huang, Vincent W. S. Wong

Bibliographic record

Venue2021 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMIMOBeamformingThroughputComputer scienceMathematical optimizationOptimization problemAlgorithmWirelessControl theory (sociology)MathematicsTelecommunicationsControl (management)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intelligent reflecting surface (IRS) and cell-free multiple-input multiple-output (CF-MIMO) systems are two promising multi-antenna technologies for the fifth generation and beyond (B5G) wireless communication systems. In this paper, we formulate a joint phase shift control and beamforming opti-mization problem to maximize the aggregate throughput subject to the reliability constraint of the users in an IRS-aided CF-MIMO system. We propose an alternating optimization (AO)-based algorithm, in which the joint problem is decomposed into a phase shift control subproblem and a beamforming subproblem. For the phase shift control subproblem, we propose a complex gradient descent (CGD)-based algorithm, which tackles the unit-modulus constraint and guarantees the aggregate throughput to be monotonic increasing in each iteration. We then propose a difference of convex programming (DCP)-based algorithm for beamforming optimization. Simulation results show that the proposed AO-based algorithm achieves an aggregate throughput that is 53.8% and 25.1% higher than the cellular MIMO system with zero-forcing beamformer and the IRS-aided CF-MIMO system with random phase shift control, respectively. Moreover, the reliability requirements of the users are satisfied with the proposed AO-based algorithm. Our results also demonstrate that the proposed algorithm improves the minimum throughput of the users and reduces the standard deviation of the throughput distribution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2021 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM)Same topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207