MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

On Meeting a Maximum Delay Constraint

2021· article· en· W4210390153 on OpenAlexaff
Hossein Shafieirad, Raviraj Adve

Bibliographic record

Venue2021 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Network Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceProbabilistic logicLatency (audio)Scheduling (production processes)Constraint (computer-aided design)Network packetComputational complexity theoryMathematical optimizationDistributed computingReal-time computingAlgorithmComputer networkMathematicsArtificial intelligenceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The recent applications in communications are required to meet low-latency transmission with high traffic rates and reliabilities. From the latency point of view, most of the state-of-the-art techniques consider the average latency which does not directly apply to delay-sensitive scenarios. In this paper, we propose a novel approach to tackle the scheduling problem by directly addressing the max-delay constraint; this is an NP-hard problem. Our main contributions are first, proposing the Super State Monte-Carlo Tree Search (SS-MCTS) as a version of regular MCTS modified for large-scale probabilistic environments with less computational complexity, and second, addressing the scheduling problem with maximum delay constraint on flows. Our numerical results demonstrate that the proposed approach significantly improves the packet delivery rate while meeting the maximum delay constraint in large-scale scenarios compared to the state-of-the-art technologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2021 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM)Same topicAdvanced Wireless Network OptimizationFrench-language works237,207