Identifying congeners and transformation products of organic contaminants within complex chemical mixtures in impacted surface waters with a top-down non-targeted screening workflow
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Over 350,000 compounds are registered for production and use including a high number of congeners found in complex chemical mixtures (CCMs). With such a high number of chemicals being released in the environment and degraded into transformation products (TPs), the challenge of identifying contaminants by non-targeted screening (NTS) is massive. "Bottom-up" studies, where compounds are subjected to conditions simulating environmental degradation to identify new TPs, are time consuming and cannot be relied upon to study the TPs of hundreds of thousands of compounds. Therefore, the development of "top-down" workflows, where the structural elucidation of unknown compounds is carried directly on the sample, is of interest. In this study, a top-down NTS workflow was developed using molecular networking and clustering (MNC). A total of 438 compounds were identified including 176 congeners of consumer product additives and 106 TPs. Reference standards were used to confirm the identification of 53 contaminants among them lesser-known pharmaceuticals (aliskiren, sitagliptin) and consumer product additives (lauramidopropyl betaine, 2,2,4-trimethyl-1,2-dihydroquinoline). The MNC tools allowed to group similar TPs and congeners together. As such, several previously unknown TPs of pesticides (metolachlor) and pharmaceuticals (gliclazide, irbesartan) were identified as tentative candidates or probable structures. Moreover, some congeners that had no entry on global repositories (PubChem, ChemSpider) were identified as probable structures. The workflow worked efficiently with oligomers containing ethylene oxide moieties, and with TPs structurally related to their parent compounds. The top-down approach shown in this study addresses several issues with the identification of congeners of industrial compounds from CCMs. Furthermore, it allows elucidating the structure of TPs directly from samples without relying on bottom-up studies under conditions discussed herein. The top-down workflow and the MNC tools show great potential for data mining and retrospective analysis of previous NTS studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".