Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previous article FreeIndex to Volume 131Full TextPDF Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmailQR Code SectionsMorearticles, discussions (d), and review essays (re)bennett, matthew, Demoralizing Trust, 511dandelet, sophia clare, Epistemic Coercion, 489dempsey, michelle madden, Coercion, Consent, and Time, 345dempsey, michelle madden, and tom dougherty, Introduction: Symposium: Coercion and Consent, 207dougherty, tom, Sexual Misconduct on a Scale: Gravity, Coercion, and Consent, 319driver, julia, and connie rosati, Editorial: From the Editors, 1fassio, davide, Perspectivism, Accessibility and the Failure of Conjunction Agglomeration, 183fischer, jeremy, Racism as Civic Vice, 539gerver, mollie, Consent and Third-Party Coercion, 246gheaus, anca, The Best Available Parent, 431hirji, sukaina, Oppressive Double Binds, 643howard, christopher, Consequentialists Must Kill, 727huddleston, andrew, Ressentiment, 670kukla, quill r, A Nonideal Theory of Sexual Consent, 270liberto, hallie, Coercion, Consent, and the Mechanistic Question, 210nebel, jacob m., Rank-Weighted Utilitarianism and the Veil of Ignorance (D), 87nebel, jacob m., Utils and Shmutils (RE), 571pummer, theron, Impermissible yet Praiseworthy, 697ritchie, katherine, Essentializing Language and the Prospects for Ameliorative Projects, 460rozeboom, grant j., Nudging for Rationality and Self-Governance (D), 107russell, paul, Responsibility Skepticism and Strawson’s Naturalism (RE), 754tadros, victor, Consent to Sex in an Unjust World, 293tarsney, christian j., Vive la Différence? Structural Diversity as a Challenge for Metanormative Theories, 151tomlin, patrick, Proportionality in War: Revising Revisionism, 34von platz, jeppe, Democratic Equality and the Justification of Welfare-State Capitalism, 4walen, alec, Risks and Weak Aggregation: Why Different Models of Risk Suit Different Types of Cases, 62book reviews (br)Alfano, Mark, Nietzsche’s Moral Psychology, neil sinhababu (BR), 122Applbaum, Arthur Isak, Legitimacy: The Right to Rule in a Wanton World, n. p. adams (BR), 369Asgeirsson, Hrafn, The Nature and Value of Vagueness in Law, daniel wodak (BR), 777Bell, Daniel A., and Pei Wang, Just Hierarchy: Why Social Hierarchies Matter in China and the Rest of the World, stephen c. angle (BR), 374Berryman, Sylvia, Aristotle on the Sources of the Ethical Life, elena cagnoli fiecconi (BR), 127Blake, Michael, Justice, Migration, and Mercy, matthew lister (BR), 600Brock, Gillian, Justice for People on the Move: Migration in Challenging Times, desiree lim (BR), 379Cohen, Elizabeth F., The Political Value of Time: Citizenship, Duration, and Democratic Justice, paulina ochoa espejo (BR), 132Cruft, Rowan, Human Rights, Ownership, and the Individual, allen buchanan and gopal sreenivasan (BR), 383Delston, Jill B., Medical Sexism: Contraception Access, Reproductive Medicine, and Health Care, emily mcgill (BR), 781Duke, George, Aristotle and Law: The Politics of Nomos, pavlos kontos (BR), 138Fischer, Bob, The Ethics of Eating Animals: Usually Bad, Sometimes Wrong, Often Permissible, justin bernstein and anne barnhill (BR), 605Forrester, Katrina, In the Shadow of Justice: Postwar Liberalism and the Remaking of Political Philosophy, gerald lang (BR), 143Glasgow, Joshua, Sally Haslanger, Chike Jeffers, and Quayshawn Spencer, What Is Race? Four Philosophical Views, luvell anderson (BR), 390Goldberg, John C. P., and Benjamin C. Zipursky, Recognizing Wrongs, linda radzik (BR), 610Hunt, Lester H., The Philosophy of Henry Thoreau: Ethics, Politics, and Nature, paul muench (BR), 615Kagan, Shelly, How to Count Animals, More or Less, joseph lynch (BR), 395Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper, Making Sense of Affirmative Action, kristina meshelski (BR), 786McGrath, Sarah, Moral Knowledge, eric wiland (BR), 398McMullin, Irene, Existential Flourishing: A Phenomenology of the Virtues, jennifer baker (BR), 790McPherson, David, Virtue and Meaning: A Neo-Aristotelian Perspective, olivia bailey (BR), 794Norcross, Alastair, Morality by Degrees: Reasons without Demands, richard yetter chappell (BR), 620Quigley, Muireann, Self-Ownership, Property Rights, and the Human Body: A Legal and Philosophical Analysis, wendy bonython (BR), 402Quong, Jonathan, The Morality of Defensive Force, joseph bowen (BR), 625Sarch, Alexander, Criminally Ignorant: Why the Law Pretends We Know What We Don’t, kimberly kessler ferzan (BR), 406Schwenkler, John, Anscombe’s “Intention”: A Guide,keshav singh (BR), 631Tadros, Victor, To Do, to Die, to Reason Why: Individual Ethics, saba bazargan-forward (BR), 799Theunissen, L. Nandi, The Value of Humanity, kenneth walden (BR), 808Tiberius, Valerie, Well-Being as Value Fulfillment: How We Can Help Each Other to Live Well, jason r. raibley (BR), 635Vallier, Kevin, Must Politics Be War? Restoring Our Trust in the Open Society, sameer bajaj (BR), 411Vanderschraaf, Peter, Strategic Justice: Convention and Problems of Balancing Divergent Interests, ryan muldoon (BR), 416Weaver, Bryan R., and Kevin Scharp, Semantics for Reasons, daniel fogal and peter van elswyk (BR), 420 Previous article DetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Ethics Volume 131, Number 4July 2021 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/713947 Views: 626 © 2021 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. Crossref reports no articles citing this article.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it