Identification of Two Major QTLs in Brassica napus Lines With Introgressed Clubroot Resistance From Turnip Cultivar ECD01
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Plasmodiophora brassicae causes clubroot disease in brassica crops worldwide. Brassica rapa , a progenitor of Brassica napus (canola), possesses important sources for resistance to clubroot. A doubled haploid (DH) population consisting of 84 DH lines were developed from a Backcross2 (BC 2 ) plant through an interspecific cross of B. rapa turnip cv. ECD01 (resistant, R) with canola line DH16516 (susceptible, S) and then backcrossed with DH16516 as the recurrent parent. The DH lines and their parental lines were tested for resistance to four major pathotypes (3A, 3D, 3H, and 5X) of P. brassicae identified from canola. The R:S segregation ratio for pathotype 3A was 1:3, and 3:1 for pathotypes 3D, 3H, and 5X. From genotyping by sequencing (GBS), a total of 355.3 M short reads were obtained from the 84 DH lines, ranging from 0.81 to 11.67 M sequences per line. The short reads were aligned into the A-genome of B. napus “Darmor- bzh ” version 4.1 with a total of 260 non-redundant single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) sites. Two quantitative trait loci (QTLs), Rcr10 ECD01 and Rcr9 ECD01 , were detected for the pathotypes in chromosomes A03 and A08, respectively. Rcr10 ECD01 and Rcr9 ECD01 were responsible for resistance to 3A, 3D, and 3H, while only one QTL, Rcr9 ECD01 , was responsible for resistance to pathotype 5X. The logarithm of the odds (LOD) values, phenotypic variation explained (PVE), additive (Add) values, and confidence interval (CI) from the estimated QTL position varied with QTL, with a range of 5.2–12.2 for LOD, 16.2–43.3% for PVE, 14.3–25.4 for Add, and 1.5–12.0 cM for CI. The presence of the QTLs on the chromosomes was confirmed through the identification of the percentage of polymorphic variants using bulked-segregant analysis. There was one gene encoding a disease resistance protein and 24 genes encoding proteins with function related to plant defense response in the Rcr10 ECD01 target region. In the Rcr9 ECD01 region, two genes encoded disease resistance proteins and 10 genes encoded with defense-related function. The target regions for Rcr10 ECD01 and Rcr9 ECD01 in B. napus were homologous to the 11.0–16.0 Mb interval of chromosome A03 and the 12.0–14.5 Mb interval of A08 in B. rapa “Chiifu” reference genome, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".