MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210458730 · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2022.102950

Concordance of regional hypoperfusion by pCASL MRI and 15O-water PET in frontotemporal dementia: Is pCASL an efficacious alternative?

2022· article· en· W4210458730 on OpenAlexafffund
Tracy Ssali, Lucas Narciso, Justin W. Hicks, Linshan Liu, Sarah Jesso, L. A. Richardson, Matthias Günther, Simon Konstandin, Klaus Eickel, Frank S. Prato, Udunna Anazodo, Elizabeth Finger, Keith St. Lawrence

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroImage Clinical · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsSt Joseph's Health CareLawson Health Research InstituteWestern University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAssociation for Frontotemporal DegenerationAlzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation
KeywordsCerebral blood flowPerfusionMedicineNuclear medicinePerfusion scanningCerebral perfusion pressureCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Clinical diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) remains a challenge due to the overlap of symptoms among FTD subtypes and with other psychiatric disorders. Perfusion imaging by arterial spin labeling (ASL) is a promising non-invasive alternative to established PET techniques; however, its sensitivity to imaging parameters can hinder its ability to detect perfusion abnormalities. This study evaluated the similarity of regional hypoperfusion patterns detected by ASL relative to the gold standard for imaging perfusion, PET with radiolabeled water (15O-water). Perfusion by single-delay pseudo continuous ASL (SD-pCASL), free-lunch Hadamard encoded pCASL (FL_TE-pCASL), and 15O-water data were acquired on a hybrid PET/MR scanner in 13 controls and 9 FTD patients. Cerebral blood flow (CBF) by 15O-water was quantified by a non-invasive approach (PMRFlow). Regional hypoperfusion was determined by comparing individual patients to the control group. This was performed using absolute (aCBF) and CBF normalized to whole-brain perfusion (rCBF). Agreement was assessed based on the fraction of overlapping voxels. Sensitivity and specificity of pCASL was estimated using hypoperfused regions of interest identified by 15O-water. Region of interest (ROI) based perfusion measured by 15O-water strongly correlated with SD-pCASL (R = 0.85 ± 0.1) and FL_TE-pCASL (R = 0.81 ± 0.14). Good agreement in terms of regional hypoperfusion patterns was found between 15O-water and SD-pCASL (sensitivity = 70%, specificity = 78%) and between 15O-water and FL_TE-pCASL (sensitivity = 71%, specificity = 73%). However, SD-pCASL showed greater overlap (43.4 ± 21.3%) with 15O-water than FL_TE-pCASL (29.9 ± 21.3%). Although aCBF and rCBF showed no significant differences regarding spatial overlap and metrics of agreement with 15O-water, rCBF showed considerable variability across subtypes, indicating that care must be taken when selecting a reference region. This study demonstrates the potential of pCASL for assessing regional hypoperfusion related to FTD and supports its use as a cost-effective alternative to PET.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.544
Threshold uncertainty score0.508

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuroImage ClinicalSame topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207