Multifunctional Drone-Based Antenna for Satellite Communication
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This communication presents a drone-to-satellite beam-forming antenna with multifunctional purposes. A glass material with a gradient coating configuration is exploited to realize a transparent structure. Beam tilting is obtained by controlling the phase distribution of an antenna by means of an inexpensive and passive surface. Simultaneously, solar cells are implemented on the proposed structure for solar energy harvesting using the transparency feature of the surface. The sputtering physical vapor deposition process is used to layer a thin coat of indium tin oxide (ITO) onto the glass. A conceptual beam tilting with a multipurpose design is introduced for drone2sat communication and energy harvest. The proposed communication structure works at a frequency of 3 GHz and covers a 60° spatial beamwidth. The directivity and propagation characteristics are preserved by this configuration. To validate the design performance, a prototype has been fabricated and a satisfactory agreement between the numerical results and experimental ones is achieved. The proposed structure can enhance the multifunctional designs, which could offer advantages for real-world space drone communications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it