Geographic and Temporal Variation in Annual Survival of a Declining Neotropical Migrant Hummingbird (Selasphorus rufus) Under Varying Fire, Snowpack, and Climatic Conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rufous hummingbirds ( Selasphorus rufus ) have shown consistent declines in abundance since 1970, with an acceleration in this trend starting in the mid-2000s. Demographic data is needed to isolate possible drivers. We employ mark-recapture data to calculate sex-specific adult apparent annual survival, accounting for residency probability, within the coastal and interior regions of British Columbia, Canada between 1998 and 2017. For the coastal region, we also examine associations between apparent survival and a suite of migratory factors: the amount of recently and historically burned flyway habitat, fall moisture availability in the alpine (snowpack), and a broad-scale climate index (SOI), under the assumption that these factors are associated with food availability during a critical period of the annual cycle. We find no trend in adult apparent survival over the 20-year period, implicating changes in recruitment rather than adult survival as driving the declining trend in abundance. Interior birds of both sexes showed lower residency probability than coastal individuals suggesting interior sites captured more late northbound individuals or more early southbound individuals within the breeding period. Adult apparent annual survival was not correlated with any of the migratory variables we examined. Our findings suggest a need to focus on juvenile recruitment as a possible driver of the long-term declines in Rufous Hummingbirds. Future studies should consider both potential threats to productivity on the breeding grounds and to juvenile survival on the non-breeding grounds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".