evaluasi pelaksanaan musyawarah perencanaan pembangunan (musrenbang) di desa aka-akae
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Musyawarah perencanaan pembangunan desa (Musrenbangdes) merupakan wahana public yang penting untuk membawa para pemangku kepentingan memahami isu dan permasalahan pembangunan daerah yang bertujuan untuk menyelesaikan masalah pembangunan desa. Salah satu desa yang patut dicermati pelaksanaan musrenbangdesnya adalah Desa Pulau Komang Sentajo dimana dalam proses penyelenggaraan musrenbang yang dilaksanakan ini, banyak sekali terdapat fenomena menarik yang terjadi, terutama berkaitan dengan langkah keterlibatan masyarakat dan stakeholders guna menyelaraskan rencana pembangunan melalui musrenbangdes.Proses pengambilan data dilakukan dengan wawancara, observasi dan dokumentasi. Analisis data dilakukan dengan cara pendekatan kualitatif. Dalam pengumpulan data tersebut menggunakan observasi, wawancara, studi pustaka, dokumentasi dan internet searching. Pengumpulan data dalam penelitian ini dilakukan dengan cara turun langsung kelapangan serta mengkajinya dengan kajian pustaka. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian di lapangan dapat diketahui bahwa Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Musyawarah Perencanaan Pembangunan Desa (Musrenbangdes)Di Desa Pulau Komang Sentajo Kecamatan Sentajo Raya Kabupaten Kuantan Singingi sudah berjalan dengan maksimal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".