Kinetic study on pyridinolysis of aryl benzenesulfonates: factors governing regioselectivity and reaction mechanism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A kinetic study is reported for reactions of 2,4-dinitrophenyl X-substituted-benzenesulfonates (1a–1f) and Y-substituted-phenyl benzenesulfonates (2a–2f) with Z-substituted-pyridines. The reactions proceed through S–O and C–O bond scissions competitively. The Yukawa–Tsuno plot for the reactions of 1a–1f with 4-oxypyridine (S–O bond fission) exhibits an excellent linearity. The Brønsted-type plot for the reactions of 2,4-dinitrophenyl benzenesulfonate (1d) with pyridines (S–O bond fission) is also linear with β nuc = 0.62. The Brønsted-type plot for the reactions of 2a–2f with 4-oxypyridines (S–O bond fission) is linear with β lg = –1.17. Thus, the reactions have been concluded to proceed through a concerted mechanism, in which leaving-group expulsion is significantly more advanced than bond formation between the electrophilic center and nucleophile at the transition state. The Hammett plot for the reactions of 1a–1f with 4-oxypyridine (C–O bond fission) exhibits scattered points with ρ X = 0.98. The Brønsted-type plot for the reactions of 1d with Z-substituted-pyridines (C–O bond fission) results in an excellent linear correlation with β nuc = 0.38. Thus, the reactions (C–O bond fission) have been concluded to proceed through a stepwise mechanism with a Meisenheimer complex, in which expulsion of the leaving group occurs after the rate-determining step. Factors governing regioselectivity and reaction mechanism are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".