MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Editorial Comment

2021· editorial· es· W4210517757 on OpenAlexaffabout
Christopher J.D. Wallis, Zachary Klaassen

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Urology · 2021
Typeeditorial
Languagees
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHealthcare Policy and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineProstate cancerReferralFamily medicinePopulationRadiation oncologyGynecologyCancerRadiation therapyGeneral surgeryGerontologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

No AccessJournal of UrologyAdult Urology1 Nov 2021Editorial CommentThis article comments on the following:The Association between Income Status and Treatment Selection for Prostate Cancer in a Universal Health Care System: A Population-Based Analysis Christopher J. D. Wallis, and Zachary Klaassen Christopher J. D. WallisChristopher J. D. Wallis Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada More articles by this author , and Zachary KlaassenZachary Klaassen Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000001942.01AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail "Editorial Comment." The Journal of Urology, 206(5), p. 1211 References 1. : Survival and complications following surgery and radiation for localized prostate cancer: an international collaborative review. Eur Urol 2018; 73: 11. Google Scholar 2. : Disparities in refusal of locoregional treatment for prostate adenocarcinoma. JCO Oncol Pract 2021; doi: 10.1200/OP.20.00839. Crossref, Google Scholar 3. : The effect of selection and referral biases for the treatment of localised prostate cancer with surgery or radiation. Br J Cancer 2018; 118: 1399. Google Scholar © 2021 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByGrosso A, Di Maida F, Mari A and Minervini A (2022) The Association between Income Status and Treatment Selection for Prostate Cancer in a Universal Health Care System: A Population-Based Analysis. Letter.Journal of Urology, VOL. 207, NO. 4, (937-938), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2022.Related articlesJournal of UrologyJun 28, 2021, 12:00:00 AMThe Association between Income Status and Treatment Selection for Prostate Cancer in a Universal Health Care System: A Population-Based Analysis Volume 206Issue 5November 2021Page: 1211-1211 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2021 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Christopher J. D. Wallis Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada More articles by this author Zachary Klaassen Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.058
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.608
Threshold uncertainty score0.868

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.058
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0120.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3920.224

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of UrologySame topicHealthcare Policy and ManagementFrench-language works237,207