MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210520822 · doi:10.1093/nar/gkac059

RbgA ensures the correct timing in the maturation of the 50S subunits functional sites

2022· article· en· W4210520822 on OpenAlexafffund
Amal Seffouh, Chirstian Trahan, Tanzila Wasi, Nikhil Jain, Kaustuv Basu, Robert A. Britton, Marlene Oeffinger, Joaquı́n Ortega

Bibliographic record

VenueNucleic Acids Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMontreal Clinical Research InstituteMcGill University
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsBiologyMutantProtein subunitBinding siteFolding (DSP implementation)Strain (injury)Cell biologyGeneticsGeneAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RbgA is an essential protein for the assembly of the 50S subunit in Bacillus subtilis. Depletion of RbgA leads to the accumulation of the 45S intermediate. A strain expressing a RbgA variant with reduced GTPase activity generates spontaneous suppressor mutations in uL6. Each suppressor strain accumulates a unique 44S intermediate. We reasoned that characterizing the structure of these mutant 44S intermediates may explain why RbgA is required to catalyze the folding of the 50S functional sites. We found that in the 44S particles, rRNA helices H42 and H97, near the binding site of uL6, adopt a flexible conformation and allow the central protuberance and functional sites in the mutant 44S particles to mature in any order. Instead, the wild-type 45S particles exhibit a stable H42-H97 interaction and their functional sites always mature last. The dependence on RbgA was also less pronounced in the 44S particles. We concluded that the binding of uL6 pauses the maturation of the functional sites, but the central protuberance continues to fold. RbgA exclusively binds intermediates with a formed central protuberance and licenses the folding of the functional sites. Through this mechanism, RbgA ensures that the functional sites of the 50S mature last.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNucleic Acids ResearchSame topicBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyFrench-language works237,207