Distribution of organochlorine pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls present in surface sediments of the Sabaki and Tana estuaries, Kenya
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and Organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) in the surface sediments of the Sabaki and Tana estuaries were studied to determine distribution as well as their ecological risk. The concentration range of PCBs and OCPs were 0.65-9.29 ng/g dw and 0.47-9.84 ng/g dw, respectively. Sabaki Bridge in the Sabaki River and Tana 4 in the Tana River recorded high levels of both PCBs and OCPs. The calculated values of DDD+DDE/ DDT showed that the presence of DDT from both the rivers is a result of historical input. The ecotoxicological impact of sediment pollution by PCBs and OCPs was assessed using sediment quality guidelines specified by the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment. The concentration values for PCB, HCB, Heptachlor epoxide, and Chlordane in this study indicate low ecological risk to sediment dwelling organisms. DDT showed an adverse biological effect to sediment dwelling organisms. As a result, there is a need to establish a programme for monitoring persistent organic pollutants in Kenya, so that any elevation in concentration above the environmental quality standards can be detected and appropriate actions taken to minimize potential adverse effects to the environment and public health.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".