MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4210535524 · doi:10.1161/str.53.suppl_1.tp59

Abstract TP59: Higher White Blood Cell Count In The First Week After Stroke Predicts Worse Cognitive Outcomes In A Population With Smaller Ischemic Strokes

2022· article· en· W4210535524 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Muhith Musabbir, Da Eun Kim, Lauren L. Drag, Michael Mlynash, María Jesús Pumar Méndez, Maarten G. Lansberg, Marion S. Buckwalter

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStroke (engine)White blood cellPopulationInternal medicineMontreal Cognitive AssessmentCognitionCognitive impairmentDiseasePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Infection after stroke is more common with large strokes and thus peripheral markers of inflammation are not well defined in stroke survivors with smaller strokes. We sought here to define the prevalence of infection, low grade fever (T≥38°C), and white blood cell count over 11x10 3 /mL (WBC>11) in the first week after stroke in subjects with smaller stroke sizes, and to ask how inflammation in the acute period affects cognitive outcomes in this population. Methods: We performed systematic chart review of hospitalization after ischemic stroke (up to 7 days) in 65 subjects enrolled in the StrokeCog study who returned for testing 5-13 months later (median stroke volume 6 mL, [IQR 0.5, 16.6]). We assessed infection (CDC consensus criteria), highest WBC, and presence of T≥38°C. Mann-Whitney U test and general linear models were used to assess whether WBC in the first week predicted outcomes at follow-up: MoCA, Stroke Impact Scale Depression (SIS3), a global cognitive score, and composite scores of memory, motor functioning, processing speed, language, and spatial ability. Models were adjusted when appropriate for age, sex, and stroke size or NIHSS at admission. Results: Infection and T≥38°C were each present in 8%, and WBC>11 in 18% of participants within 7 days of stroke. Since only high WBC was present in a substantial proportion of subjects, we compared outcomes in high (>11) vs. normal (≤11) WBC. Subjects with high WBC had larger strokes (13cc [6.6, 38.6] vs. 3.2[0.4, 10.6], p= 0.027) and worse admission NIHSS (10[4,13)] vs 2[1,5], p =0.003). In addition, WBC>11 in the first week was associated with worse mood and lower scores in memory, language, and global cognition months later. After adjustment, WBC remained significantly predictive of mood ( p =.039) and global cognition ( p =0.003); language remained significant if adjusted for stroke size ( p =0.010) but not NIHSS ( p =0.19). Conclusions: Infection and T≥38°C are uncommon during acute hospitalization of ischemic stroke survivors who can return to complete comprehensive testing batteries 5-13 months later. WBC>11 within the first week after stroke may be a marker of later inflammation and predicts more chronic depression and worse cognitive outcomes in this population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management→French-language works237,207→