MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4210549501 · doi:10.1002/alz.052413

Sparse canonical correlation analysis reveals relationships between TDP‐43 within the entorhinal cortex and fractional anisotropy across widespread white matter tracts

2021· article· en· W4210549501 on OpenAlexaff
Ashley Heywood, Julie A. Schneider, David A. Bennett, Konstantinos Arfanakis, Mirza Faisal Beg, Lei Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWhite matterFractional anisotropyEntorhinal cortexAlzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging InitiativeDementiaNeuropathologyDiffusion MRICorrelationPsychologyBetweenness centralityNeuroscienceNuclear medicineMedicineBiologyPathologyDiseaseMagnetic resonance imagingMathematicsStatisticsHippocampusRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background While research has focused on gray matter alterations in neurodegeneration, investigating the relationship between white matter and neuropathology allows for additional insight into disease effects on broad brain networks. TAR DNA‐binding protein 43 (TDP‐43), which has shown to be involved in various neurodegenerative disorders involving axonal damage including ALS, FTLD, and LATE, is associated with lower WM integrity. We used sparse canonical correlation analysis (SCCA) to explore the relationships between ante‐mortem WM integrity and post‐mortem TDP‐43. Method Diffusion weighted images were gathered on a 1.5T scanner and processed using TORTOISE in order to calculate fractional anisotropy (FA) in a sample of 70 older adults from two longitudinal cohort studies, the Religious Orders Study and Rush Memory and Aging Project. We registered the white matter ROIs from the John’s Hopkins University (JHU) DTI atlas to the study‐specific template using ANTS. Average FA was computed for each ROI and was included in the SCCA. A semi‐quantitative rating of TDP‐43 severity was assessed in 5 regions. Disease burden in each region and average FA within 48 ROIs were inputs for the SCCA. A fused lasso penalty based on permutation testing was employed to promote sparsity. Result The 70 subjects were 91.10 (SD=6.08) years old at death with a median interval from MRI to death of 3.11 years (SD=1.45). Sixty‐four percent were female, and 36% had dementia at their last study visit prior to death. TDP pathology was present in 47% of individuals. SCCA produced one canonical variable (Cor=0.36) which identified one regional pathology variable (TDP‐43 within the entorhinal cortex; Feature weight =‐1.0) and six FA ROIs: pontine crossing tract (0.597), splenium of corpus callosum (0.531), right anterior limb of internal capsule (0.001), superior corona radiata (0.411), and bilateral anterior corona radiata (Right: 0.115 and Left: 0.422). Conclusion Identified WM ROIs within the brainstem align with previous research within TDP‐43 related disorders, including those with motor neuron involvement such as FTLD‐U. Further, findings within bundles connecting parietal and temporal areas indicate the importance of TDP‐43 in broad brain networks which could relate to the deficits seen in memory and executive functions within FTLD and related disorders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications→French-language works237,207→