MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4210554356 · doi:10.1161/circ.142.suppl_4.264

Abstract 264: Traumatic and Hemorrhagic Complications After Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest

2020· article· en· W4210554356 on OpenAlexaff
My-Linh Nguyen, Emma Gause, Brianna Mills, Joseph E. Tonna, Heidi Alvey, Richard Saczkowski, Brian Grunau, Lance B. Becker, David F. Gaieski, Scott T. Youngquist, Jessica Hamilton, Jenelle Badulak, Samuel P. Mandell, Eileen M. Bulger, Nicholas J. Johnson

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's HospitalKelowna General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineExtracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitationCardiopulmonary resuscitationExtracorporeal membrane oxygenationResuscitationComplicationIncidence (geometry)SurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is a rescue therapy for treatment of refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA). We describe the incidence of traumatic and hemorrhagic complications among patients undergoing ECPR for OHCA and the association between CPR duration and ECPR-related injuries or bleeding. Methods: We examined prospectively collected data from the Extracorporeal Resuscitation Outcomes Database (EROD), which includes ECPR-treated OHCAs from participating hospitals (Oct 2014 - Aug 2019). The primary outcome was traumatic or hemorrhagic complications, defined as injury to the chest, abdomen, or vasculature, or bleeding requiring transfusion or surgery. The primary exposure was the cardiac arrest to ECPR initiation interval (CA-ECPR interval), measured as the time from arrest to initiation of ECPR. Descriptive statistics were used to compare demographic, cardiac arrest, and ECPR characteristics among patients with and without CPR-related traumatic or bleeding complications. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association between CPR duration and traumatic or bleeding complications. Results: A total of 68 patients from 4 hospitals received ECPR for OHCA were entered into EROD and met inclusion criteria. Median age was 51 (IQR 38-58), 81% were male, 40% had BMI > 30, and 70% had pre-existing medical comorbidities. A total of 65% had an initial shockable cardiac rhythm, mechanical CPR was utilized in at least 29% of patients, and 27% were discharged alive. A total of 37% experienced a traumatic or bleeding complication, with major bleeding (32%), vascular injury (18%), and cannula site bleeding (15%) being the most common. Compared to patients with shorter CPR times, patients with a 10 minute longer CA-ECPR interval had 18% (95% CI -2-42%) higher odds of suffering a mechanical or bleeding complication, but this did not reach statistical significance (p=0.08). Conclusions: Traumatic injuries and bleeding complications are common among patients undergoing ECPR. Further study is needed to investigate the relation between arrest duration and complications. Clinicians performing ECPR should anticipate and assess for injuries and bleeding in this high-risk population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation→French-language works237,207→