MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Regulation of epidermal growth factor receptor signaling by clathrin‐coated membrane microdomains (603.2)

2014· article· en· W4210559875 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Costin N. Antonescu, Camilo Garay, Ralph Christian Delos Santos, Gurjeet Judge, Stephen Bautista, Stefanie Lucarelli, Rohan Pandey

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsClathrinEndocytosisCell biologyInternalizationEpidermal growth factor receptorReceptor-mediated endocytosisDynaminEndocytic cycleEpidermal growth factorChemistrySignal transductionCaveolaeBiologyReceptorBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF) binding to its receptor (EGFR) activates several signaling intermediates including Akt, leading to control of cell survival and metabolism. Concomitantly, ligand‐bound EGFR is rapidly incorporated into clathrin‐coated pits, eventually leading to receptor internalization. Whether clathrin scaffolds have functions at the cell surface prior to internalization, such as facilitating EGFR signaling, is poorly understood. To determine if clathrin scaffolds are required for activation of specific EGFR signaling pathways, we employed selective perturbation of clathrin (which prevents formation of clathrin scaffolds) and dynamin (which allows formation of clathrin scaffolds but prevents EGFR endocytosis). We find that siRNA gene silencing or pharmacological inhibition of clathrin, but not of dynamin, inhibits activation of the Akt pathway by EGFR but not receptor autophosphorylation. Using total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy, we have examined the localization of EGFR signaling intermediates vis‐à‐vis clathrin‐coated pits. Our findings indicate that clathrin scaffolds may represent unique signaling microdomains within the plasma membrane, a function that can be separated from the role of clathrin in endocytosis. Grant Funding Source : Supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research→French-language works237,207→