Optical Design of DEI/ABI System at the HEX Beamline at the NSLS-II
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diffraction Enhanced Imaging (DEI) or Analyzer Based Imaging (ABI) uses a perfect crystal monochromator and matching analyzer to achieve sensitivity to x-ray refraction and ultra small-angle scattering on the order of 0.01 micro-radians. As such, a thermal bump caused by heat-load in the order of 1 W is detrimental. The heat load at the HEX (High Energy Engineering X-ray) super-conducting wiggler (SCW) beamline, under construction at the NSLS-II, is on the order of 1 kW. How to reconcile the three orders of magnitude difference between the HEX source power and the DEI/ABI requirements? The solution involves using a double-crystal bent-Laue monochromator as pre-monochromator to prepare a beam with a large divergence and bandwidth that is matched to a flat crystal post-monochromator. We show through phase-space (x-ray energy vs. angle as viewed by a flat crystal) analysis and Dumond diagrams that there is indeed a unique bending radius that matches the double-crystal bent-Laue monochromator in phase space to the flat Bragg crystal. The matched system has a desirable feature that the phase space of the bent crystal’s output beam is much larger than that of the flat crystal, making the combined system stable. Based on these considerations, here we present our optical design for performing DEI/ABI at the HEX beamline
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it