MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210576745 · doi:10.1017/9781800105362.005

PEERS AND PERFORMERS IN THE REIGN OF HENRY VI

2022· book-chapter· en· W4210576745 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
James H. Forse

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClassical Antiquity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReignHistoryPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ongoing volumes of the University of Toronto’s Records of Early English Drama ( REED ) and the online REED Patrons and Performances provide information concerning performance activities from about half of medieval and early modern England: 17 counties, 9 municipalities. It also includes Wales. When augmented by information found in other sources, like Ian Lancashire’s Dramatic Texts and Records of Britain , the Malone Society’s Plays and Players in Norfolk and Suffolk , and others, the data reveal thousands of performances in large and small communities throughout the kingdom. A survey and analysis of these records during the reign of Henry VI has revealed an unusual increase in payments to travelling and visiting performers, unmatched in the surviving record evidence from before or after his reign. This paper presents an exploration of this striking pattern. For purposes of analysis I use a master spreadsheet created from data in the REED volumes and various other sources. The spreadsheet lists travelling performers from one of the earliest records, King Edward I’s ystrioni at Christ Church Priory (1277), until the end of the reign of James I (1625). At present it contains over 9,000 entries from most areas of medieval and early modern England. The spreadsheet includes: performers identified by patron or place of origin, types of performers, dates and places of performances, and payments to performers if such were recorded. The terms performers or entertainers are used to cover a variety of activities. The terminology in the records is often very loose. Until records began to be written in English rather than Latin (c.1525), dramatic records refer to histriones , mimi , luditores , and lusitores . Histriones and mimi could designate ‘actors’ of some sort, and luditores and lusitores are generic terms for ‘players’ (which could mean game players and/or actors). Performers designated as minstrels , which dominate the records examined here, were most often musicians but could be actors, dancers, or all of these. Entertainers such as bearwards, keepers of animals in the royal menageries, jugglers, and jesters are usually specified, and musicians are sometimes identified as trumpeters, pipers, harpists, drummers, or waits. Therefore for the following discussion and tables, in the absence of more specific designation, the Latin terms histriones , mimi , and luditores are all translated as ‘entertainers’ or ‘performers’.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score0.235

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicClassical Antiquity StudiesFrench-language works237,207