MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210581388 · doi:10.5376/mpr.2022.12.0001

Effects of Temperature and Gibberellin Treatment on Seed Germination Characteristics of <i>Caryopteris incana</i> (Thunb.) Miq.

2022· article· en· W4210581388 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xiaohua Shi, Guangying Ma, Jin Liang, Qingcheng Zou

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicinal Plant Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBotany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGerminationGibberellinOrnamental plantSowingHorticulturePlant propagationBiologyBotanyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Caryopteris incana (Thunb.) Miq . is an excellent ornamental, nectariferous plant and medicinal plant as a widely distributed species of the Caryopteris . Based on the determination of the length, width, 1 000-grain weight and water absorption of vanilla seeds, the effects of temperature and gibberellin treatment on seed germination were explored. The results showed that the average length and width of the seeds were 2.43 mm and 1.94 mm. The 1000-grain weight of the seeds was 0.57 g. The seed reached saturation after 4 hours of water absorption. Seeds can germinate at 15℃~30℃ and hardly germinated above 35℃. The optimal temperature for germination is 20℃~25℃. Gibberellin treatment can significantly improve the germination rate of Cyperus angustifolia , especially under the conditions of low temperature (15℃) and high temperature (35℃), 100 ~ 200 mg/L gibberellin treatment can improve the germination rate and shorten the germination period of the seeds. This study provides important theoretical support for the sowing and propagation of C. incana , and the theoretical basis for the planting and breed improvement of C. incana in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicinal Plant ResearchSame topicBotany, Ecology, and Taxonomy StudiesFrench-language works237,207