In brief
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Demythologizing the Romance of Conquest, by Jeanne Armstrong (Westport: Greenwood P, 2000). Science Fiction Culture, by Camille Bacon‐Smith (Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 2000). Out of the Shadows: A History of Women in Twentieth‐Century Wales, by Deirdre Beddoe (Cardiff, Wales: U of Wales P, 2000). The Cistercian Evolution: The Invention of a Religious Order in Twelfth‐Century Europe, by Constance Hoffman Berman (U of Pennsylvania P, 2000). Cauldron of Changes: Feminist Spirituality in Fantastic Fiction, by Janice C. Crosby (Jefferson, North Carolina, and London: McFarland & Company, Inc., 2000). Animal, Vegetable, or Woman'?, by Kathryn Paxton George (New York: State U of New York P, 2000). New Woman Fiction: Women Writing First‐Wave Feminism, by Ann Heilmann (New York: Palgrave, 2000). Body Politics and the Fictional Double, edited by Debra Walker King (Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana UP, 2000). Women's Bodies/Women's Lives: Health, Well‐Being and Body Image, edited by Baukje Miedema, Janet M. Stoppard, and Vivienne Anderson (Toronto: Sumach P, 2000). Sita, Revised Edition, by Kate Millet (Urbana: U of Illinois P, 2000). Framing the Sexual Subject: The Politics of Gender, Sexuality, and Power, edited by Richard Parker, Regina Maria Barbosa, and Peter Aggleton (Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: U of California P, 2000). The Retrieval of a Legacy: Nineteenth Century American Women Inventors, by Denise Pilato (Westport: Praeger Publishers, 2000). Carnal Appetites: FoodSexldentities, by Elspeth Probyn (Routledge, 2000). Poetic Epistemologies: Gender and Knowing in Women's Language‐Oriented Writing, by Megan Simpson (New York: State U of New York P, 2000). The Private Rod: Marital Violence, Sensation, and the Law in Victorian Britain, by Marlene Tromp (Charlottesville: UP of Virginia, 2000). Healing Narratives: Women Writers Curing Cultural Dis‐ease, by Gay Wilentz (New Brunswick: Rutgers UP, 2000).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.690 | 0.530 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".