Comparing recent and preindustrial cladoceran assemblages in 35 metal- and smelting-affected lakes near Sudbury (Ontario, Canada)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Base metal smelting activity around Sudbury (Ontario, Canada) has persisted for over a century, emitting metals and acidifying contaminants that affected lakes downwind of smelter stacks. Although considerable research has been directed toward the paleolimnological study of diatoms and chrysophytes in the region, relatively little comparable work has been completed on invertebrates. Here, cladoceran (Branchiopoda: Cladocera) assemblages are compared using a paleolimnological “top-bottom approach”, comparing preimpact and recent assemblages. Spatiotemporal differences were likely driven by acidification-related stressors and legacy effects of metal contamination. The replacement of the Daphnia longispina complex with the Daphnia pulex complex is attributable to diminished lake-water calcium concentrations. Increased abundances of early colonist taxa demonstrate that many acidified lakes have not fully recovered. Regional stressors further complicate recovery and the interpretation of temporal changes. Finally, clustering of recent cladoceran assemblages reflects the effects of modern multiple stressors and persistent historical stressors. This study shows that acidification history partially explains differences in cladoceran assemblages, but also that multiple stressors will likely continue to influence assemblage composition and recovery in Sudbury lakes. Defining appropriate reference conditions, considering historical and modern stressors, will be important when assessing the extent and trajectory of ecosystem recovery from widespread anthropogenic impacts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".