MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210613940 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac254

Effect of evolving physical constants on type Ia supernova luminosity

2022· article· en· W4210613940 on OpenAlexaff
Rajendra P. Gupta

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsSupernovaAstrophysicsLuminosityPhysical constantType (biology)AstronomyGalaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Type Ia supernovae, SNeIa, are used as standard candles in cosmology to determine the distances of the galaxies harbouring them. We show that the luminosity of an SNIa depends on its distance from us when physical constants (the speed of light c, the gravitational constant G, and the Planck constant h) are permitted to evolve. It is because the Chandrasekhar mass of the white dwarf that explodes to create SNIa depends on the values of the constants at the epoch the SNIa is formed. We show that the SNeIa luminosities could be about four times higher in the past than they are now. Thus, the luminosity distance estimation of the earliest SNeIa could be off by up to a factor of 2. Cosmological parameters, determined with this correction applied to the redshift versus distance modulus data base (Pantheon SNeIa), are not very different from those from the standard ΛCDM model without this correction, except for the dark-energy density and the curvature energy density; the latter increases at the cost of the former. Variations of the constants are given by $\dot{G}/G = \ 3.90 \ ( { \pm 0.04} ) \times {10^{ - 10}}\ {\rm y{r^{ - 1}}}$and $\dot{c}/c = \dot{h}/h\ = \ 1.30\ ( { \pm 0.01} ) \times {10^{ - 10}}\ {\rm y{r^{ - 1}}}$ at present. These variations are valid only when $G,\ c,\ $and$\ h$ are permitted to vary concurrently rather than individually.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietySame topicGamma-ray bursts and supernovaeFrench-language works237,207