MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4210620601 · doi:10.1161/str.53.suppl_1.wp8

Abstract WP8: Blood Pressure And EVT Outcomes By The Baseline Perfusion And Recanalization Timing

2022· article· en· W4210620601 on OpenAlexaff
Beom Kyung Kim, Nishita Singh, Bijoy K. Menon, Mohammed Almekhlafi, Wi‐Sun Ryu, Jihoon Kang, Sung Hyun Baik, Jun Yup Kim, Keon‐Joo Lee, Cheolkyu Jung, Moon‐Ku Han, Hee‐Joon Bae

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryFoothills Medical Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePerfusionCardiologyPerfusion scanningBlood pressureInternal medicineProspective cohort studyCerebral perfusion pressureCoefficient of variationBlood volume

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Leptomeningeal collaterals help maintain cerebral perfusion after the large vessel occlusion (LVO), potentially regulated by systemic blood pressure (BP). We hypothesized that the association between BP and endovascular treatment (EVT) outcomes would differ by the baseline perfusions status and before and after recanalization. Method: From a prospective registry, we identified anterior circulation LVO patients who received EVT ≤24 hours after their onset, had baseline perfusion, and achieved post-EVT mTICI ≥2b. BPs were measured from arrival at 5-minute intervals in the ER and during the procedure. Systolic BPs (SBP) up to 24 hours after EVT were summarized as dropmax (the maximal decrement over two consecutive measurements), incmax (the maximal increment), mean, coefficient of variation, and standard deviation. Baseline perfusion images were quantified using Olea Sphere. Infarct proportion was defined as the volume of final infarct on DWI within the volume of Tmax>6 sec. Significant hemorrhage included PH2 or HBC class 3. 3-month mRS was prospectively collected. Result: A total of 388 LVO patients were included. Mean SBP at arrival was 153 ± 42 mm Hg; the average count of BP measurements was 47 ± 17 per patient.In the adequate baseline perfusion group, i.e., hypoperfusion intensity ratio (HIR) <0.5, SBP parameters were better associated with infarct proportion and functional outcome before the recanalization period; weaker associations were noted after recanalization. In the poor baseline perfusion group, i.e., HIR ≥0.5, SBP parameters before recanalization were partially associated with the infarct proportion but not functional status. No association between SBP parameters and significant hemorrhage was noted. (estimates in Table) Conclusion: Association between BP and patient outcomes differs by baseline perfusion status and before and after recanalization. BP management during the peri-EVT period may therefore need to be individualized.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management→French-language works237,207→