High Wear Resistance of Ultralow-wear Polyethylene With Different Molecular Weights Under Different Contact Pressure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Ultralow-wear polyethylene (ULWPE), a type of polyethylene homocomposite with excellent wear resistance, has recently been reported, however its underlying wear mechanism has yet to be clarified. In the current study, three different molecular weights of ULWPE from 205 to 748 Kg/mol, were experimentally evaluated on a multidirectional motion pin-on-disk (POD) wear tester under a contact pressure from 2 to 4 MPa, compared with conventional UHMWPE. The high wear resistance mechanism of ULWPE was investigated with respect to mechanical, microstructural, and surface properties. Compared with UHMWPE, ULWPE had excellent wear resistance. Structure and mechanical characterization showed that the crystallinity and lamellar thickness of ULWPE were significantly higher than those of UHMWPE, which endowed ULWPE with high hardness and strength. Despite its considerably smaller molecular weight than that of UHMWPE, ULWPE still had high interphase content, leading to its superior toughness. The crystallinity, lamellar thickness, Young’s modulus, yield stress, and elongation at break of ULWPE exhibited a downward trend with the increase of molecular weight. Conversely, the interphase content of ULWPE increased with the molecular weight increase. Among all the ULWPE samples, ULWPE with a molecular weight 748 Kg·mol -1 had the least wear, as a result of combined both excellent strength and adequate toughness. With an increase in contact pressure, the wear losses of different polymers tended to increase. The wear losses of the least wear ULWPE were 4.71±0.04 mm 3 /Million Cycles (Mc), 5.11±0.37 mm 3 /Mc, and 5.77±0.62 mm 3 /Mc under 2, 3, and 4 MPa. Comprehensive strength and toughness reduced abrasive wear and adhesion wear, endowing ULWPE with excellent wear resistance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".