MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4210671591 · doi:10.1002/alz.057821

Impact of COVID pandemic on neuropsychiatric symptoms and caregiver distress in cognitively impaired older adults

2021· article· en· W4210671591 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Prasad R. Padala, C. Heath Gauss, Hannah N McKinney, Samuel J. House, Kalpana P. Padala

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLonelinessDistressDementiaIrritabilityAnxietyMedicineCognitionCaregiver burdenQuality of life (healthcare)Clinical psychologyPsychiatryPandemicCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PsychologyGerontologyDiseaseInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) are cardinal symptoms of dementia. They are often associated with functional decline, poor quality of life, and caregiver burden. Anecdotal reports have suggested increase in NPS during the COVID pandemic. However, decreased time demands on the caregivers could be hypothesized to have improved relationships and indirectly NPS. There has been limited literature on whether NPS improved or worsened during the current pandemic. The current study examines the prevalence of NPS and changes in NPS profile during the pandemic. Loneliness, cognition, function, and caregiver distress were also studied. Methods The COVID Dementia study is an ongoing cross‐sectional study of community dwelling cognitively impaired older adults (N=102). Loneliness was assessed with the 3‐item loneliness questionnaire, cognition with the Tele‐Montreal Cognitive Assessment (T‐MoCA), and functional status with the Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ). Neuropsychiatry symptoms including severity and distress were collected using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) and change during COVID was also recorded for each symptom. Results Mean age was 73.0 (±8.0) years, 96.1% male, 42.2% rural, 75.2% Caucasian, and 24.8% non‐Caucasian. T‐MoCA and FAQ mean scores were 15.2 (±4.6) and 8.0 (±9.3), respectively. Loneliness was prevalent in majority of participants (53.5%). Mean loneliness score was 4.7 (±2.1). Mean NPI total severity and total distress were 7.5 (±6.5) and 10.9 (±8.8), respectively. Irritability and night‐time behavior were most frequently reported symptoms (45.7% each), followed by anxiety (45.3%), and agitation (41.1%). Majority of the participants reported worsening of neuropsychiatric symptoms during COVID (61.5%). Irritability, agitation, and anxiety was the cluster that was reported as most frequently worsened symptoms during the pandemic followed by depression and apathy cluster (Fig. 1). Among those that reported worsening of neuropsychiatric symptoms, 66.1% noted an increase in ≥ two symptoms. Conclusions Older adults with pre‐existent cognitive impairment may be at high risk for loneliness and worsening of neuropsychiatric symptoms during the COVID pandemic. Some NPS might worsen more frequently during the pandemic and need particular attention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→French-language works237,207→