MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210674704 · doi:10.3389/fphy.2021.765960

Achieving Effective Renormalization Scale and Scheme Independence via the Principle of Observable Effective Matching

2022· article· en· W4210674704 on OpenAlexaff
Farrukh Chishtie

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Physics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObservableRenormalizationRSSPhysicsMatching (statistics)Perturbation theory (quantum mechanics)Effective field theoryIndependence (probability theory)Statistical physicsMathematicsParticle physicsQuantum mechanicsComputer scienceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, we explicate a new approach for eliminating renormalization scale and scheme (RSS) dependence in observables. We develop this approach by matching RSS-dependent observables (such as cross-sections and decay rates) to a theory which is independent of both these forms of dependencies. We term the fundamental basis behind this approach as the principle of observable effective matching (POEM), which entails matching of a scale- and scheme-dependent observable with the fully physical scale (PS) and dynamical scale-dependent theory at loop orders at which RSS independence is guaranteed. This is aimed toward achieving so-called “effective” RSS-independent expressions as the resulting dynamical dependence is derived from a particular order in RSS-dependent perturbation theory. With this matching at a PS at which the coupling (and masses) is experimentally determined at this scale, we obtain an “effective theoretical observable (ETO)”, a finite-order RSS-independent version of the RSS-dependent observable. We illustrate our approach with a study of the cross-section ratio <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="m1"><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>−</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math> for e + e − → hadrons, which is demonstrated to achieve scale and scheme independence utilizing the three- and four-loop order <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="m2"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>̄</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:math> scheme expression in QCD perturbation theory via matching at both one-loop and two-loop orders for obtaining the ETO. With two-loop matching, we obtain an ETO prediction of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="m3"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>−</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.05243</mml:mn><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.0006</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.0006</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math> at Q = 31.6 GeV , which is in excellent agreement with the experimental value of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="m4"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>−</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.052</mml:mn><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mn>7</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.005</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.005</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math> . Given its new conceptual basis, ease of use, and performance, we contend that POEM be explored in its application for obtaining ETOs for predicting RSS-independent observables across domains of high-energy theory and phenomenology as well as other areas of fundamental and applied physics, such as cosmology and statistical and condensed matter physics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.798
Threshold uncertainty score0.385

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in PhysicsSame topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesFrench-language works237,207