Toward superior fatigue and corrosion fatigue crack initiation resistance of Sanicro 28 pipe super austenitic stainless steel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present work deals with the fatigue and corrosion-fatigue crack initiation in cold-pilgered Sanicro 28 super austenitic stainless steel. Toward this end, the stress-controlled symmetric reverse bending fatigue tests were conducted in air and mixed acid aqueous solution under the stress amplitude of 200–570 MPa with the stress ratio of −1 and frequencies of 1 and 15 Hz at ambient temperature. The fatigue study was supplemented with electrochemical experiments and advanced microstructural analyses to explore the damage characteristics in detail. The planar character of dislocation substructure owing to the low stacking fault energy of the material, and formation of parallel slip bands led to a more homogenous distribution of the imposed strain which retarded the progress of damage accumulation. According to the X-ray photoelectron spectrometer results, the formation of the insoluble and stable MoO3 oxide increased the rate of repassivation. This sticky oxide resisted against breakdown rendered by the attack of aggressive chloride ions. The corrosion fatigue behavior of the experimented alloy under the various test frequencies was discussed relying on the synergistic effects of mechanical and environmental damages.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".