Long‐term survival of Atlantic salmon following catch and release: Considerations for anglers, scientists and resource managers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract To evaluate the scientific basis for catch and release as a management tool, a comprehensive 3‐year study compared long‐term survival of Atlantic salmon that were either angled, radio‐tagged and released, or trapped, radio‐tagged and released (control). Overall, the mean survival probability of angled salmon relative to the control group was between 0.94 and 0.98. At cool to moderate water temperatures (10–18°C) mean survival of angled salmon was between 0.96 and 0.98. Although the number of salmon caught and released above 21°C was low, catchability was slightly reduced at warm water temperatures (21–25°C) and the mean survival probability was between 0.43 and 0.69. Lastly, the number of fish that survived the spawning period did not differ between the angled group and the control group. However, the mean percentage of fish that overwintered and migrated downstream through a counting fence to sea was between 9% and 10% for those that were caught and released and between 13% and 19% for the control group. Results of this study suggest that mortality of caught and released Atlantic salmon can be delayed but remains low at cool to moderate water temperatures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".