Preliminary results in comparison of caudal epidural injection of hyaluronidase versus hypertonic saline in managing lumbosacral canal stenosis: A randomized clinical trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Lumbosacral spinal stenosis (LSS) is one of the most common causes of back pain and disability. Its treatment varies from conservative and medical to surgical treatment, and the indications for its optimal management are not obviously defined. Epidural steroid injection is commonly used for pain relief in LSS. This study aims to compare the adjuvant efficacy of caudal epidural injection (CEI) of hyaluronidase with steroid versus hypertonic saline with steroid in patients with LSS. Methods: This clinical trial was done in a prospective, randomized, double-blind approach; it was conducted among 30 patients aged between 45 – 75 years who suffered from low back and leg pain in recent 6 months due to LSS. The patients were randomly allocated to two groups. Group A included 15 patients who received fluoroscopically guided CEI containing steroid, local anesthetic, and hyaluronidase, and Group B consisted of 15 patients who received fluoroscopically guided CEI containing steroid, local anesthetic, and hypertonic saline. The outcome measures included the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (QBPDS), which were obtained from patients before the CEI as a baseline and after the second, fourth, and eighth weeks. Results: Before injection, there were no statistically significant differences between the two studied groups, neither in demographic characteristics nor in VAS, ODI, and QBPDS parameters. After injection, the mean of ODI and QBPDS improved from the baseline to the 2 nd , 4 th , and the 8 th weeks in both groups (p < 0.001) without any superiority between the two groups (p > 0.05). However, there was a significant improvement of the mean VAS score through the second and fourth weeks in Group A (p = 0.032, 0.050). VAS score in the eighth week was equal without any superiority in both groups (p > 0.05). Additionally, the mean social life status was significantly improved in group A in the 4 th and 8 th weeks after the intervention. Conclusions: In short-term follow-up, Caudal epidural injection of hyaluronidase, as well as hypertonic saline, seems to be effective in the management of LSS without any superiority in both materials. However, in the 2 nd and 4 th weeks after the procedure, better improvement of means VAS score was observed in the hyaluronidase group.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".