MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4210694428 · doi:10.1161/circ.142.suppl_4.286

Abstract 286: Factors Associated with Non-survival From In-hospital Maternal Cardiac Arrest: An Analysis of Get with the Guidelines (gwtg) Data

2020· article· en· W4210694428 on OpenAlexaff
Carolyn M. Zelop, Richard E. Shaw, Dana P. Edelson, Steven Lipman, Jill M. Mhyre, Farida M. Jeejeebhoy, Sharon Einav

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUnivariate analysisCardiopulmonary resuscitationPulseless electrical activityResuscitationLogistic regressionInternal medicineEmergency medicineCardiologyMultivariate analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Maternal mortality has risen in the United States during the 21 st century. Factors influencing outcome of maternal cardiac arrest (MCA) remain largely unexplored. Hypothesis: We sought to further elucidate the factors affecting maternal death from in-hospital (IH) MCA. Methods: Our query of the American Heart Association’s GWTG ® -Resuscitation voluntary registry from 2000-2017 revealed 561 index cases of in IH MCA with complete outcome data. Logistic regression was performed using hospital death as the primary outcome and included variables with a p value = 0.1 or less based upon univariate analysis. Age, race, year of arrest, pre-existing conditions, first documented pulseless rhythm, and location of arrest were used in the model. Sensitivity analyses and assessment of variable interaction were also performed to test model stability. Results: Among 561 cases of MCA, 57.2% (321/561) did not survive to hospital discharge. In-hospital death was not associated with maternal age, race and year of event. In the final model (see table), IH death was significantly associated with prearrest hypotension/hypoperfusion (p=0.009). While MCA cases with a shockable vs non-shockable first documented pulseless rhythm had similar outcomes, those with an indeterminate rhythm were less likely to die, (p=0.014). The occurrence of MCA outside of the delivery suite (referent group) or operating room was associated with a significantly higher risk of death: ICU/Recovery Room (p=0.001) and ER/other (p= 0.012). In a sensitivity analysis, removal of the indeterminate group did not alter outcomes regarding first documented pulseless rhythm or arrest location. Area under the curve for the final model was 0.715 (95% CI 0.673-0.757). Conclusions: Our study identified several novel factors associated with IH death of our MCA cohort. More research is required to further understand the pathophysiologic dynamics affecting outcomes of IHCA in this unique population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation→French-language works237,207→