MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4210702356 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1139963/v1

Associations between cognitive impairment and cerebrovascular reserve in different lobes during the acute stroke of anterior circulations

2022· preprint· en· W4210702356 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mengna Chu, Wei Dong, Chao Huang, Bin Dong, Ming Yao

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAnhui University of Chinese MedicineAnhui Medical UniversityAnhui University
KeywordsMontreal Cognitive AssessmentCardiologyMedicineDementiaStroke (engine)Frontal lobeInternal medicineInfarctionCerebral blood flowCognitionCerebral infarctionIschemiaDiseaseMyocardial infarctionPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Cognitive impairments at the acute stroke phase should not be ignored, and its potential risk factors and mechanism need to be clinically assessed. Recently, various studies revealed that reduced cerebrovascular reserve (CVR) predicts cognitive declines such as mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. However, the association of CVR in different lobes with cognitive impairment at the acute stroke phase remains unclear. In this study, we analyzed the correlation between CVR in different lobes and cognitive impairment at the acute stroke phase in cerebral infarction patients. Method This study included 125 subjects: 96 in the acute stroke phase (38 left infarction and 58 right infarction) and 29 healthy controls with no history of neurological disease. The basic sociodemographic characteristics of the two groups matched and their cognitive status was assessed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). The CVR was assessed by CT perfusion imaging scans, including cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral blood volume (CBV), time to peak (TTP), and mean transit time (MTT). Results The MoCA scores of visuospatial/executive, attention, and orientation in both left and right infarctions patients significantly decreased. Nevertheless, the MoCA scores for naming, language, and delayed recall significantly only decreased in left infarction patients. The CBF of right vessels in the frontal lobe and the MTT of left vessels in the occipital lobe was negatively related to the MoCA scores of left infarction patients. The CBV of left vessels in the frontal lobe and CBF of left vessels in the parietal lobe were positively related to the MoCA scores of left infarction patients. The CBF of right vessels in the temporal lobe was negatively related to the MoCA scores of right infarction patients. Finally, the CBF of the left vessels in the temporal lobe was positively related to the MoCA scores of right infarction patients. Conclusions CVR was closely related to cognitive impairment at the acute stroke phase. Decreasing CVR might be a potential neuroimaging biomarker to predict cognitive impairment at the acute stroke phase.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Square→Same topicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases→French-language works237,207→