MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210719606 · doi:10.14740/jocmr4662

A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study of Severe Breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 Infection in the General Population Requiring Hospitalization Within a Single Health System

2022· article· en· W4210719606 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Roshan Acharya, Smita Kafle, Natalie Kandinata, Brian Slipman, Meera Ghimire, Andrew B. Trotter

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Medicine Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCross-sectional studyRetrospective cohort studySevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PopulationIntensive care medicineEmergency medicineSurgeryInternal medicineEnvironmental healthPathologyDiseaseInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Despite coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination efforts, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections in vaccinated individuals ("breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections") have emerged. Our understanding of breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections continues to evolve, and there is a paucity of information describing severe breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections. We conducted this study with the aim of describing breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections requiring hospitalization and exploring factors associated with severe breakthrough infection. METHODS: The study included patients within our health network who received at least one dose of a messenger RNA (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccine and required hospitalization due to breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection from January 1 to August 15, 2021. We performed a descriptive analysis of vaccinated patients requiring hospitalization. Multivariable logistic regression (LR) analysis was performed to explore factors associated with severe breakthrough infection. RESULTS: Out of 67,223 vaccinated individuals, 78 (0.12%) patients were hospitalized with breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection, of which 25 individuals (0.04% of those vaccinated, and 32% of all hospitalized) developed severe infection. The mean age of those with breakthrough infection was 72 years, the majority were White (60%), and dyspnea was the most common reason for hospital admission (53%), with bimodal peaks of hospitalization in January-February (40%) and July-August (34%). In LR analysis, male patients had 4.03 times the odds of developing severe SARS-CoV-2 infection than female patients (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 4.03, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.21 - 13.40), and an immunocompromising condition had 6.32 times the odds of developing severe COVID-19 disease (aOR: 6.32, 95% CI: 1.48 - 26.18). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of severe breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection was very low, and male sex and immunocompromising conditions were associated with severe breakthrough infection. Clinicians and health systems should continue to campaign for COVID-19 vaccination aggressively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.272
GPT teacher head0.558
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Medicine ResearchSame topicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchFrench-language works237,207