MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210732974 · doi:10.1080/17538947.2021.2023667

Greenhouse area detection in Guanzhong Plain, Shaanxi, China: spatio-temporal change and suitability classification

2022· article· en· W4210732974 on OpenAlexaff
Caihong Gao, Qifan Wu, Miles Dyck, Jialong Lv, Hailong He

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Digital Earth · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLand Use and Ecosystem Services
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGreenhouseChinaGeographyDistribution (mathematics)AgricultureEnvironmental scienceGreenhouse gasPhysical geographyGeologyArchaeologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The extensive use of greenhouses has brought soared economic benefits for farming practitioners in China and an overview of the spatio-temporal distribution of greenhouses is of great interest to agricultural practitioners and decision-makers. In this study, Landsat image based greenhouse maps in Guanzhong Plain, Shaanxi, China were made using random forest classification algorithm through visual interpretation on the Google Earth Engine. The 7-year's changes in greenhouse areas were investigated (i.e. 2000, 2003, 2006, 2010, 2013, 2015 and 2019) with yearly overall accuracy more than 90%. The results showed that the total area of greenhouses in Guanzhong Plain demonstrated an increasing trend, from 5.92 km2 in 2000 to 194.42 km2 in 2019 with a considerable growth between 2010 and 2015. The dominant drivers for the increase are largely attributed to the government policy as well as economic profitability. The distribution of greenhouse shifts to central and eastern regions of Guanzhong Plain. Greenhouses preferentially expand to the area near to rural roads, main rivers, and high elevation, with more than 45% greenhouses distributed within 1 km of the county rural road. The principal component analysis based suitability evaluation showed that a total of 38.44% of the area was suitable for greenhouse.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.464

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Digital EarthSame topicLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesFrench-language works237,207