MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210783483 · doi:10.2967/jnumed.121.263255

Assessing Reactive Astrogliosis with <sup>18</sup>F-SMBT-1 Across the Alzheimer Disease Spectrum

2022· article· en· W4210783483 on OpenAlexaff
Victor L. Villemagne, Ryuichi Harada, Vincent Doré, Shozo Furumoto, Rachel S. Mulligan, Yukitsuka Kudo, Samantha C. Burnham, Natasha Krishnadas, Pierrick Bourgeat, Ying Xia, Simon M. Laws, Svetlana Bozinovski, Kun Huang, Miloš D. Ikonomović, Jürgen Fripp, Kazuhiko Yanai, Nobuyuki Okamura, Christopher C. Rowe

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nuclear Medicine · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicS100 Proteins and Annexins
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Aging
FundersNational Health and Medical Research CouncilMedical Research CouncilUniversity of Pittsburgh
KeywordsAstrogliosisDiseaseAlzheimer's diseaseMedicineInternal medicineCentral nervous system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Neuroinflammatory reaction in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) brains involves reactive astrocytes which overexpress monoamine oxidase-B (MAO-B). 18F-SMBT-1 is a novel F-18 PET tracer highly selective for MAO-B. We characterized the clinical performance of 18F-SMBT-1 PET across the Alzheimer’s disease (AD) continuum as a potential surrogate marker of reactive astrogliosis Methods: We assessed 18F-SMBT-1 PET regional binding in 77 volunteers (76±5.5 y.o.; 41F/36M) across the AD continuum: 57 cognitively unimpaired controls (CN, 44 Aβ- & 13 Aβ+), 12 mild cognitively impaired (MCI, 9 Aβ- & 3 Aβ+), and 8 AD dementia patients (6 Aβ+ and 2 Aβ-). All participants also underwent Aβ and tau PET imaging, 3T MRI and neuropsychological evaluation. Tau imaging results were expressed in standard uptake value ratios (SUVR) using the cerebellar cortex as reference region, while Aβ burden was expressed in Centiloids. 18F-SMBT-1 outcomes were expressed as SUVR using the subcortical white matter as reference region. Results:18F-SMBT-1 yielded high contrast images at steady state (60-80 min after injection). When compared to Aβ-CN, there were no significant differences in 18F-SMBT-1 binding in the Aβ-MCI group. Conversely, 18F-SMBT-1 binding was significantly higher in several cortical regions in the Aβ+AD group, but also was significantly lower in mesial temporal and basal ganglia. Most importantly, 18F-SMBT-1 binding was significantly higher in the same regions in Aβ+CN when compared to Aβ-CN. When all clinical groups were considered together, 18F-SMBT-1 was highly correlated with Aβ burden, and much less with tau burden. While in most cortical regions 18F-SMBT-1 was not correlated with brain volumetrics, regions known for high MAO-B concentrations presented a direct association with hippocampal and grey matter volumes, while the occipital lobe was directly associated with white matter hyperintensities. 18F-SMBT-1 binding was inversely correlated with MMSE and AIBL PACC in some neocortical regions such as the frontal cortex, lateral temporal and supramarginal gyrus. Conclusion: Cross-sectional human PET studies with 18F-SMBT-1, showed that Aβ+AD, but most importantly, Aβ+CN have significantly higher regional 18F-SMBT-1 binding than Aβ- CN. Moreover, in several regions in the brain, 18F-SMBT-1 retention was highly associated with Aβ load. These findings suggest that increased 18F-SMBT-1 binding is detectable at the preclinical stages of Aβ accumulation, providing strong support for its use as surrogate marker of astrogliosis in the AD continuum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations63
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Nuclear MedicineSame topicS100 Proteins and AnnexinsFrench-language works237,207