MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4210790879 · doi:10.1161/str.53.suppl_1.tp197

Abstract TP197: Early Direct Oral Anticoagulants Therapy After Ischemic Stroke In Patients With And Without Atrial Fibrillation:A Pooled Analysis Of Five Studies

2022· article· en· W4210790879 on OpenAlexaff
Anas Alrohimi, Laura Gioia, Mahesh Kate, Kelvin Ng, Dar Dowlatshahi, Thalia S. Field, Shelagh B. Coutts, Muzzafar Siddiqui, Michael D. Hill, Jodi Miller, Robert G. Hart, Glen C. Jickling, Ashfaq Shuaib, Brian Buck, Mukul A Sharma, Kenneth Butcher

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsHamilton General HospitalUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of OttawaMcMaster UniversityAlberta Health ServicesPopulation Health Research InstituteUniversité de MontréalUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAtrial fibrillationStroke (engine)Odds ratioModified Rankin ScaleAsymptomaticIntracerebral hemorrhageInternal medicineClinical endpointConfidence intervalCardiologySurgeryIschemic strokeRandomized controlled trialIschemiaSubarachnoid hemorrhage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Early anticoagulation after acute ischemic stroke is usually avoided due to the risk of hemorrhagic transformation (HT). We aimed to assess the rate of radiological HT associated with direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) initiation within 48 hours vs. > 48 hours in the post-stroke period. Methods: A pooled analysis of five studies of DOAC initiation within 14 days of ischemic stroke onset was conducted. The primary endpoint was incident radiographic HT on follow-up imaging. Secondary endpoints included symptomatic HT, new parenchymal hemorrhage (PH1 or asymptomatic PH2), recurrent systemic events, systemic hemorrhagic complications, mortality within the study period, final modified Rankin Scale score. The results were reported as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: A total of 468 patients were enrolled. Median infarct volume was 1.35 (0-7.5) ml, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale was 1 (0-3). Incident radiographic HT was seen on follow-up scan in 29 patients. DOAC initiation within 48 hours from index event onset was not associated with incident HT (adjusted OR 0.67, [0.31 - 1.50] P =0.34). No patients developed symptomatic HT. Conversely, 25 patients developed recurrent ischemic events, 64% of which occurred within 14 days. Initiating DOAC within 48 hours of onset was not associated with a reduction in the risk of recurrent ischemic events (OR 0.47, [0.19 - 1.20] P =0.12). In contrast to HT, recurrent ischemic events were associated with poor functional outcomes (OR=6.8, [2.95 - 15.63], p<0.0001). Conclusions: Early DOAC initiation after stroke was not associated with increased incident HT risk. Recurrent ischemic events were common and associated with poor outcomes. These data may be useful for estimating outcome rates and sample size calculations in future trials of early versus late DOAC initiation after AF-related stroke.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.083

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0130.031
Bibliometrics0.0060.006
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management→French-language works237,207→