1-Year Outcomes after Transcatheter Mitral Valve Implantation: Results from the Global CHOICE-MI Registry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
All articles of this category Background: Transcatheter mitral valve implantation (TMVI) is a novel treatment alternative for patients with mitral regurgitation (MR), who are suboptimal candidates for mitral valve surgery or transcatheter edge-to-edge repair. However, extensive data on outcomes of patients treated with TMVI is scarce. Method: The global CHoice of OptImal transCatheter trEatment for Mitral Insufficiency Registry (CHOICE-MI) included 767 patients from 26 centers, who underwent evaluation for TMVI eligibility. The present study included all patients with severe MR treated with TMVI. Clinical, echocardiographic and computed tomography baseline parameters were assessed for all patients. Outcomes included procedural characteristics, clinical, echocardiographic and functional outcome per MVARC criteria. The primary composite outcome was all-cause mortality or heart failure (HF) hospitalization after 1 year. Median follow-up time was 1.94 (1.53, 2.11) years. Results: A total of 229 patients with MR (76 years [71.0, 81.0], 36.7% female, STS PROM 5.7% [3.2, 8.6]) underwent TMVI with 10 different dedicated devices (89.2% transapical, 10.8% transseptal). MR etiology was primary (28.8%), secondary (58.4%), or mixed (12.8%). Moderate or severe mitral annulus calcification (MAC) was present in 27 patients (13.0%). Median baseline ejection fraction was 40.0% (IQR: 35.0–54.0). Technical success was 95.2% with low procedural mortality ( N = 4, 1.8%). Access site complications, reintervention for bleeding and conversion to surgery occurred in 9.6, 7.5, and 2.8%, respectively. Thirty-day mortality rate was 9.6%. The primary composite endpoint of all-cause mortality or HF hospitalization occurred in 39.2% of patients, without differences between primary MR (44.1%) and secondary MR (39.1%) and mixed primary/secondary MR (20.0%) ( p = 0.68). Residual MR after TMVI was ≤1+ in 95.1% at discharge and 95.2% after 1 year (each p < 0.001, for the comparison to MR at baseline). After 1 year, 82.7% of followed-up patients had NYHA functional Class I or II ( p < 0.001, for the comparison to NYHA functional Class at baseline). Conclusion: In this global multicenter registry, TMVI was associated with high technical success and low procedural mortality regardless of MR etiology. Durable elimination of MR was achieved in the majority of treated patients. This finding was accompanied by significant functional improvement among surviving patients after 1 year. Publication History Article published online: 03 February 2022 © 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".