MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210813117 · doi:10.1101/2022.02.03.479057

Laboratory and field trials reveal the potential of a gel formulation of entomopathogenic nematodes as biocontrol against the fall armyworm ( <i>Spodoptera frugiperda</i> )

2022· preprint· en· W4210813117 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Patrick Fallet, Didace Bazagwira, Julie Morgane Guenat, Carlos Bustos‐Segura, Patrick Karangwa, Ishimwe Primitive Mukundwa, Joëlle Kajuga, Thomas Degen, Stefan Toepfer, Ted C. J. Turlings

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicEntomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Commission for Science and TechnologyDepartment for International DevelopmentInternational Development Research Centre
KeywordsFall armywormBiologyNoctuidaeAgronomyInfestationLepidoptera genitaliaPEST analysisSpodopteraBiological pest controlEntomopathogenic nematodeToxicologyHorticultureBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1. Abstract The fall armyworm (FAW), Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) can cause tremendous yield losses in maize. Its invasion into Africa and Asia has led to an enormous influx of insecticides into maize agro-ecosystems. Safe, effective and readily available alternatives are desperately needed. Entomopathogenic nematodes (EPN) are commonly used against soil insect pests, but can also control some above-ground pests. We explored the possibility to control FAW by incorporating EPN into a formulation that can be easily applied into the whorl of maize plants, where the caterpillars mostly feed. We tested this approach in laboratory cage experiments as well as in field trials. In the laboratory, treating maize plants with a low dose of EPN in a carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) gel formulation (about 3000 infective juveniles per plant), caused 100% mortality of FAW caterpillars and prevented plant damage considerably, whereas EPN applied in water or a surfactant-polymer-formulation (SPF) caused 72% and 94% mortality, respectively. Under field conditions, one-time treatments with EPN applied in water, SPF or CMC gel were all able to prevent significant plant damage, but only the EPN-gel formulation significantly reduced FAW infestation. Notably, the gel formulation was as effective as a standard dose of cypermethrin, an insecticide commonly used against FAW. Repeated applications may be needed to reduce re-infestations by FAW across a whole cropping season depending on the local maize phenology and pest dynamics. These findings demonstrate that EPN are excellent candidates for the biological control of FAW and are a safe and sustainable alternative to chemical insecticides. Highlights Entomopathogenic nematodes are highly lethal to fall armyworm caterpillars. Appropriate formulation of the nematodes is crucial for above-ground application. A gel formulation of entomopathogenic nematodes was as effective as chemical insecticides. Entomopathogenic nematodes can be used for the control of fall armyworm in maize.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score0.965

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicEntomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest ControlFrench-language works237,207